"All governments should be pressured to correct their abuses of human rights"
About this Quote
Stallman’s line lands less like a noble sentiment and more like a standing order: don’t ask whether governments abuse human rights, assume they do, then build pressure into the system. The verb choice matters. “Pressured” sidesteps faith in benevolent institutions and points to leverage, friction, collective insistence. It’s the language of activism, not civics class - a reminder that rights aren’t self-enforcing, and that waiting for official self-correction is a kind of complicity.
The subtext is classic Stallman: skepticism of centralized power, especially when it hides behind procedural legitimacy. “All governments” is deliberately indiscriminate, refusing the comfortable story that abuses are a problem “over there.” It also hints at a technical worldview in which incentives and constraints shape outcomes more reliably than good intentions. You can hear the engineer’s instinct: if a system predictably fails, you don’t praise it; you redesign the environment so failure becomes costly.
Contextually, Stallman’s politics can’t be separated from his work in free software. His career is a long argument that control over tools is political, that technology is a terrain where rights are either protected or silently traded away. When he talks about pressuring governments, it’s not abstract moralizing - it’s a parallel to his insistence on user freedom: transparency, auditability, and the ability to resist coercion. The quote’s bluntness is the point. It treats human rights as a permanent adversarial relationship with authority, not a mission statement on a plaque.
The subtext is classic Stallman: skepticism of centralized power, especially when it hides behind procedural legitimacy. “All governments” is deliberately indiscriminate, refusing the comfortable story that abuses are a problem “over there.” It also hints at a technical worldview in which incentives and constraints shape outcomes more reliably than good intentions. You can hear the engineer’s instinct: if a system predictably fails, you don’t praise it; you redesign the environment so failure becomes costly.
Contextually, Stallman’s politics can’t be separated from his work in free software. His career is a long argument that control over tools is political, that technology is a terrain where rights are either protected or silently traded away. When he talks about pressuring governments, it’s not abstract moralizing - it’s a parallel to his insistence on user freedom: transparency, auditability, and the ability to resist coercion. The quote’s bluntness is the point. It treats human rights as a permanent adversarial relationship with authority, not a mission statement on a plaque.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List





