"All I know about thermal pollution is that if we continue our present rate of growth in electrical energy consumption it will simply take, by the year 2000, all our freshwater streams to cool the generators and reactors"
About this Quote
Brower’s line is engineered to feel like a back-of-the-envelope calculation you can’t unsee. He takes the abstract, sleep-inducing phrase “thermal pollution” and translates it into a single, grotesquely simple image: every freshwater stream repurposed as an industrial cooling system. The move is rhetorical jujitsu. Instead of debating parts per million or projected demand curves, he forces a confrontation with scale. If energy growth keeps compounding, nature doesn’t just get “impacted”; it gets requisitioned.
The intent isn’t to offer a literal hydrological forecast so much as to puncture the era’s faith that electricity is clean by default because it’s invisible at the socket. Brower targets the hidden metabolism of power: the heat you have to dump somewhere. By foregrounding cooling water, he collapses the comforting distance between “generation” and “ecosystem,” making the grid’s externalities legible in the language of scarcity.
The subtext is accusatory: what we call progress is quietly converting public commons into private infrastructure. Streams become inputs; rivers become exhaust systems. And by naming “generators and reactors” together, he links fossil and nuclear not by ideology but by physics, insisting that the environmental bill arrives regardless of which fuel you prefer.
Context matters: mid-to-late 20th century America was building big - dams, plants, suburban demand - while environmentalism was learning how to argue in numbers and systems. Brower’s genius is to make systems thinking feel visceral, turning exponential growth into an ecological hostage note addressed to the year 2000.
The intent isn’t to offer a literal hydrological forecast so much as to puncture the era’s faith that electricity is clean by default because it’s invisible at the socket. Brower targets the hidden metabolism of power: the heat you have to dump somewhere. By foregrounding cooling water, he collapses the comforting distance between “generation” and “ecosystem,” making the grid’s externalities legible in the language of scarcity.
The subtext is accusatory: what we call progress is quietly converting public commons into private infrastructure. Streams become inputs; rivers become exhaust systems. And by naming “generators and reactors” together, he links fossil and nuclear not by ideology but by physics, insisting that the environmental bill arrives regardless of which fuel you prefer.
Context matters: mid-to-late 20th century America was building big - dams, plants, suburban demand - while environmentalism was learning how to argue in numbers and systems. Brower’s genius is to make systems thinking feel visceral, turning exponential growth into an ecological hostage note addressed to the year 2000.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by David
Add to List
