"All I know for certain is that reading is of the most intense importance to me; if I were not able to read, to revisit old favorites and experiment with names new to me, I would be starved - probably too starved to go on writing myself"
About this Quote
Penelope Lively treats reading not as pastime but as sustenance, the condition of possibility for her life as a writer. The hunger metaphor is telling: books are nourishment, and without them the creative organism wastes away. She makes a compact between reading and writing, suggesting that writing is not a solitary act sprung from pure originality but a continuation of an ongoing conversation that feeds on other voices. To revisit old favorites is to return to the pantry that stores memory, cadence, and the tonalities that once shaped her; to experiment with names new to her is to vary the diet, to allow surprise and disruption to keep the mind alive.
This balance between familiarity and novelty mirrors themes that run through Livelys fiction, especially her preoccupation with memory, time, and the layered presence of the past. Rereading reactivates earlier selves and their responses; new reading challenges those selves, creating friction that generates fresh insight. The phrase all I know for certain underscores how fundamental this is: amid the uncertainties of craft, market, or fashion, the one reliable engine is attentive reading.
There is also the quiet acknowledgment of aging. Lively, a Booker Prize winner for Moon Tiger and a writer of memoir as well as novels, writes often about the way time rearranges experience. The conditional if I were not able to read hints at the vulnerability of a late-life writer whose eyesight, energy, or world might contract. Reading becomes a portable form of mobility, a way to keep traveling through ideas when the body slows, and it sustains the will to go on writing.
Finally, the emphasis on names affirms curiosity about authorship itself: to encounter a new name is to open a door onto another mind. That appetite for other minds is what keeps the language of her work vital. Creativity, in this view, is not the ex nihilo production of novelty but the metabolizing of a rich and varied diet of books.
This balance between familiarity and novelty mirrors themes that run through Livelys fiction, especially her preoccupation with memory, time, and the layered presence of the past. Rereading reactivates earlier selves and their responses; new reading challenges those selves, creating friction that generates fresh insight. The phrase all I know for certain underscores how fundamental this is: amid the uncertainties of craft, market, or fashion, the one reliable engine is attentive reading.
There is also the quiet acknowledgment of aging. Lively, a Booker Prize winner for Moon Tiger and a writer of memoir as well as novels, writes often about the way time rearranges experience. The conditional if I were not able to read hints at the vulnerability of a late-life writer whose eyesight, energy, or world might contract. Reading becomes a portable form of mobility, a way to keep traveling through ideas when the body slows, and it sustains the will to go on writing.
Finally, the emphasis on names affirms curiosity about authorship itself: to encounter a new name is to open a door onto another mind. That appetite for other minds is what keeps the language of her work vital. Creativity, in this view, is not the ex nihilo production of novelty but the metabolizing of a rich and varied diet of books.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Penelope
Add to List

