"All mankind is now learning that these nuclear weapons can only serve to destroy, never become beneficial"
About this Quote
Myrdal’s line lands with the chill clarity of someone who has watched governments dress catastrophe in the language of strategy. “All mankind is now learning” sounds generous, even patient, but it’s also an indictment: the lesson is obvious, yet it takes mushroom clouds and arms races for officials to admit it. The phrase turns the Cold War into a grim classroom where the curriculum is extinction.
Her most surgical move is “can only serve.” That’s not moralizing about war in general; it’s an attempt to shut down the seductions of nuclear exceptionalism: deterrence theory, prestige politics, the fantasy of “peace through strength.” By framing nukes as instruments that “only” destroy, she denies them any legitimate policy role. No “beneficial” use, no responsible modernization, no safe threshold, no tidy separation between possession and use. It’s a diplomatic veto disguised as a simple statement.
The context matters. Myrdal wasn’t a pamphleteer; she was a Swedish diplomat and later a leading disarmament voice in an era when nuclear powers marketed arsenals as stabilizing, even humane compared to conventional slaughter. Neutral Sweden gave her a platform to critique both blocs without sounding like propaganda. Her intent is to puncture the bureaucratic euphemisms that make annihilation administratively thinkable.
Subtext: humanity is being forced to mature. Nuclear weapons aren’t just bigger bombs; they rewrite politics into a permanent hostage situation. Myrdal’s sentence tries to make that reality un-debatable, because the moment you treat mass destruction as “useful,” you’ve already normalized the unthinkable.
Her most surgical move is “can only serve.” That’s not moralizing about war in general; it’s an attempt to shut down the seductions of nuclear exceptionalism: deterrence theory, prestige politics, the fantasy of “peace through strength.” By framing nukes as instruments that “only” destroy, she denies them any legitimate policy role. No “beneficial” use, no responsible modernization, no safe threshold, no tidy separation between possession and use. It’s a diplomatic veto disguised as a simple statement.
The context matters. Myrdal wasn’t a pamphleteer; she was a Swedish diplomat and later a leading disarmament voice in an era when nuclear powers marketed arsenals as stabilizing, even humane compared to conventional slaughter. Neutral Sweden gave her a platform to critique both blocs without sounding like propaganda. Her intent is to puncture the bureaucratic euphemisms that make annihilation administratively thinkable.
Subtext: humanity is being forced to mature. Nuclear weapons aren’t just bigger bombs; they rewrite politics into a permanent hostage situation. Myrdal’s sentence tries to make that reality un-debatable, because the moment you treat mass destruction as “useful,” you’ve already normalized the unthinkable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Alva
Add to List



