"All men have an equal right to the free development of their faculties; they have an equal right to the impartial protection of the state; but it is not true, it is against all the laws of reason and equity, it is against the eternal nature of things"
About this Quote
Cousin opens by handing you the Enlightenment goodie bag - equal rights, self-development, an impartial state - then yanks it back mid-sentence. The architecture is the point: a liberal preamble designed to disarm, followed by a hard brake that asserts limits as if they were physics. That abrupt pivot ("but it is not true") is less argument than authority move, the kind meant to end debate by upgrading political preference into "the laws of reason and equity" and, finally, "the eternal nature of things."
As a 19th-century French philosopher and public intellectual, Cousin is speaking from inside the post-Revolution settlement, when France kept oscillating between radical equality and conservative restoration. His brand of eclectic spiritualism aimed to reconcile modern rights-talk with hierarchy - in education, in class, and often in gender. The subtext is managerial: yes, people may have rights in theory, but society cannot be reorganized as if those rights imply equal outcomes, equal social roles, or equal authority. The state should be "impartial" in protection, yet not neutral about order.
The rhetorical trick is naturalization. By invoking "eternal nature", Cousin launders contingent social arrangements into metaphysical inevitabilities. It's a classic move of liberal-conservative synthesis: affirm the moral dignity of persons while refusing the political implications that dignity might demand. The sentence breaks off because the real content sits in the unsaid: equal rights, up to the point where equality becomes disruptive.
As a 19th-century French philosopher and public intellectual, Cousin is speaking from inside the post-Revolution settlement, when France kept oscillating between radical equality and conservative restoration. His brand of eclectic spiritualism aimed to reconcile modern rights-talk with hierarchy - in education, in class, and often in gender. The subtext is managerial: yes, people may have rights in theory, but society cannot be reorganized as if those rights imply equal outcomes, equal social roles, or equal authority. The state should be "impartial" in protection, yet not neutral about order.
The rhetorical trick is naturalization. By invoking "eternal nature", Cousin launders contingent social arrangements into metaphysical inevitabilities. It's a classic move of liberal-conservative synthesis: affirm the moral dignity of persons while refusing the political implications that dignity might demand. The sentence breaks off because the real content sits in the unsaid: equal rights, up to the point where equality becomes disruptive.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Victor
Add to List








