"All movements go too far"
About this Quote
Russell distills a law of collective action: once a cause gathers momentum, its energy carries it past the point of balance. Movements begin as necessary corrections to real injustices. To rouse people, they simplify, sharpen moral contrasts, and reward zeal. Success then attracts militants, opportunists, and purists who outbid one another in fervor. The rallying cry hardens into dogma, dissent becomes betrayal, and measures that were tools become ends. The very force that breaks inertia becomes the force that overshoots.
This diagnosis fits the pendulum pattern of history. The French Revolution’s demand for liberty slid into the Terror. Bolshevik promises of equality hardened into dictatorship. Temperance campaigns for public health produced Prohibition with its own harms. Even honorable movements risk purity spirals and heresy hunts, where guarding the boundary of identity eclipses improving the world beyond it. Platforms and media amplify this drift, since indignation travels farther than nuance.
Russell’s skepticism about fanaticism underpins the aphorism. A logician who prized fallibility and freedom, he supported reform yet distrusted certainty. He opposed World War I on pacifist grounds but later judged resistance to fascism necessary, a shift that underscored his preference for provisional judgments over absolute creeds. The warning is not an argument for complacency or false equivalence; some causes are morally urgent, and refusing to move can itself be a form of going too far. Rather, it is a call to build movements that can stop, listen, and self-correct.
The practical implications are modest and hard: cultivate internal dissent, set sunset clauses and measurable ends, reward de-escalation as well as mobilization, and keep humanity of opponents in view. Aim for remedies that are strong enough to work but humble enough to be revised. Without such guardrails, the arc of collective passion bends toward excess, turning cures into new maladies.
This diagnosis fits the pendulum pattern of history. The French Revolution’s demand for liberty slid into the Terror. Bolshevik promises of equality hardened into dictatorship. Temperance campaigns for public health produced Prohibition with its own harms. Even honorable movements risk purity spirals and heresy hunts, where guarding the boundary of identity eclipses improving the world beyond it. Platforms and media amplify this drift, since indignation travels farther than nuance.
Russell’s skepticism about fanaticism underpins the aphorism. A logician who prized fallibility and freedom, he supported reform yet distrusted certainty. He opposed World War I on pacifist grounds but later judged resistance to fascism necessary, a shift that underscored his preference for provisional judgments over absolute creeds. The warning is not an argument for complacency or false equivalence; some causes are morally urgent, and refusing to move can itself be a form of going too far. Rather, it is a call to build movements that can stop, listen, and self-correct.
The practical implications are modest and hard: cultivate internal dissent, set sunset clauses and measurable ends, reward de-escalation as well as mobilization, and keep humanity of opponents in view. Aim for remedies that are strong enough to work but humble enough to be revised. Without such guardrails, the arc of collective passion bends toward excess, turning cures into new maladies.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Bertrand
Add to List




