"All of us, whether guilty or not, whether old or young, must accept the past. It is not a case of coming to terms with the past. That is not possible. It cannot be subsequently modified or undone"
About this Quote
Von Weizsaecker’s line lands like a disciplined refusal of the comforting loopholes nations reach for after catastrophe. Spoken by a German head of state who made his name insisting that May 8, 1945 be understood as “liberation,” it’s aimed at a society still tempted, decades after the war, to treat history as a negotiable contract: a matter of balancing the books, trading remorse for closure, swapping shame for a forward-looking slogan.
The pivot is his rejection of the familiar therapy metaphor, “coming to terms.” That phrase implies a bargain: if we do the emotional work, the past will loosen its grip. Von Weizsaecker denies the transaction. The past is not a defendant you can plea down; it is a fixed record that keeps judging you by what you do next. In that way, the sentence is less about memory than about responsibility. “Whether guilty or not” is doing heavy lifting: he isn’t flattening culpability, he’s broadening obligation. Even those who did not commit the crimes inherit their consequences, their institutions, their silences, their temptations to relativize.
There’s also a quiet warning to the young. “Whether old or young” preempts the generational escape hatch: you can’t outsource moral accounting to grandparents you didn’t vote for. Acceptance here isn’t passive resignation; it’s the starting point for democratic adulthood. By insisting the past cannot be “modified or undone,” he blocks revisionism and sentimental reconciliation alike, steering the audience toward the only arena where change is still possible: the present, and the political choices that shape the future.
The pivot is his rejection of the familiar therapy metaphor, “coming to terms.” That phrase implies a bargain: if we do the emotional work, the past will loosen its grip. Von Weizsaecker denies the transaction. The past is not a defendant you can plea down; it is a fixed record that keeps judging you by what you do next. In that way, the sentence is less about memory than about responsibility. “Whether guilty or not” is doing heavy lifting: he isn’t flattening culpability, he’s broadening obligation. Even those who did not commit the crimes inherit their consequences, their institutions, their silences, their temptations to relativize.
There’s also a quiet warning to the young. “Whether old or young” preempts the generational escape hatch: you can’t outsource moral accounting to grandparents you didn’t vote for. Acceptance here isn’t passive resignation; it’s the starting point for democratic adulthood. By insisting the past cannot be “modified or undone,” he blocks revisionism and sentimental reconciliation alike, steering the audience toward the only arena where change is still possible: the present, and the political choices that shape the future.
Quote Details
| Topic | Letting Go |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List
