"All psychological research is completely barred by the interpretations of the psychoanalysts. Everything happens in the unconscious, and I don't know what this unconscious is"
About this Quote
Sarraute is doing something more surgical than dunking on Freud: she’s diagnosing an epistemic monopoly. “Completely barred” casts psychoanalysis less as a method than as a border checkpoint, where entry to “psychological research” requires the right metaphysical passport. The jab isn’t that the unconscious doesn’t exist; it’s that psychoanalytic language can become a totalizing interpretive regime, one that pre-answers every question by routing it through a single tunnel: “Everything happens in the unconscious.” When a framework explains everything, it also explains nothing in particular.
Her second sentence is the lethal turn. “And I don’t know what this unconscious is” performs a lawyerly cross-examination: define your terms. The tone matters - not mystical, not reverent, but impatiently empirical. She’s pointing at the conceptual slippage psychoanalysis can trade on: “the unconscious” as a catch-all that absorbs contradictions, like a legal fiction that can’t be falsified because it’s always just offstage. If any objection can be refiled as “resistance,” the theory becomes self-sealing.
Context sharpens it. Sarraute, a key figure of the nouveau roman, was obsessed with the half-formed micro-movements beneath speech - what she called “tropisms.” She cared about interiority, but distrusted grand explanatory narratives. Coming from law, she’s attuned to how interpretive authority works: who gets to name motives, whose story counts as evidence. The subtext is a warning about cultural power disguised as insight: psychoanalysis as a priesthood of interpretation, turning messy human experience into tidy doctrine, while claiming the only key to the locked room it also insists exists.
Her second sentence is the lethal turn. “And I don’t know what this unconscious is” performs a lawyerly cross-examination: define your terms. The tone matters - not mystical, not reverent, but impatiently empirical. She’s pointing at the conceptual slippage psychoanalysis can trade on: “the unconscious” as a catch-all that absorbs contradictions, like a legal fiction that can’t be falsified because it’s always just offstage. If any objection can be refiled as “resistance,” the theory becomes self-sealing.
Context sharpens it. Sarraute, a key figure of the nouveau roman, was obsessed with the half-formed micro-movements beneath speech - what she called “tropisms.” She cared about interiority, but distrusted grand explanatory narratives. Coming from law, she’s attuned to how interpretive authority works: who gets to name motives, whose story counts as evidence. The subtext is a warning about cultural power disguised as insight: psychoanalysis as a priesthood of interpretation, turning messy human experience into tidy doctrine, while claiming the only key to the locked room it also insists exists.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Nathalie
Add to List






