"All sides in a trial want to hide at least some of the truth"
About this Quote
The line lands like a confession masquerading as realism: the courtroom isn’t a cathedral for Truth, it’s a stage where truth is rationed, framed, and often strategically buried. Coming from Alan Dershowitz, a celebrity defense lawyer who has spent decades inside adversarial combat, it’s less a cynical shrug than a job description. He’s pointing at the system’s core bargain: trials aren’t designed to produce a complete narrative; they’re designed to test competing narratives under rules that reward control.
The specific intent is disarming candor. By saying “all sides,” Dershowitz spreads the indictment evenly: prosecution, defense, sometimes even judges and witnesses. No one is exempt because everyone has incentives. Lawyers are obligated to zealously advocate within ethical limits, which frequently means highlighting favorable facts, minimizing harmful ones, and keeping certain material out through evidentiary motions. “Hide” is the deliberately provocative verb here; it collapses polite legal euphemisms like “exclude,” “stipulate,” or “limit prejudicial evidence” into the blunt moral language the public uses.
The subtext is a warning about innocence fantasies. People want trials to function like moral sorting machines; Dershowitz is reminding us they’re procedural machines. In that sense, the quote doubles as reputational armor: if outcomes feel unsatisfying or incomplete, it’s not always corruption - it’s the predictable consequence of a system built on advocacy, not omniscience.
Context matters: Dershowitz’s career in high-profile, polarizing cases makes the observation feel both world-weary and self-justifying. It invites us to ask the uncomfortable follow-up: if truth is always partially hidden, then power lies in who gets to decide which parts stay in the dark.
The specific intent is disarming candor. By saying “all sides,” Dershowitz spreads the indictment evenly: prosecution, defense, sometimes even judges and witnesses. No one is exempt because everyone has incentives. Lawyers are obligated to zealously advocate within ethical limits, which frequently means highlighting favorable facts, minimizing harmful ones, and keeping certain material out through evidentiary motions. “Hide” is the deliberately provocative verb here; it collapses polite legal euphemisms like “exclude,” “stipulate,” or “limit prejudicial evidence” into the blunt moral language the public uses.
The subtext is a warning about innocence fantasies. People want trials to function like moral sorting machines; Dershowitz is reminding us they’re procedural machines. In that sense, the quote doubles as reputational armor: if outcomes feel unsatisfying or incomplete, it’s not always corruption - it’s the predictable consequence of a system built on advocacy, not omniscience.
Context matters: Dershowitz’s career in high-profile, polarizing cases makes the observation feel both world-weary and self-justifying. It invites us to ask the uncomfortable follow-up: if truth is always partially hidden, then power lies in who gets to decide which parts stay in the dark.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Alan
Add to List



