"All this is applicable to the intellectual faculties of man. There is a considerable difference between one person and another as regards these faculties, as is well known to philosophers"
About this Quote
Maimonides slips a radical social claim into the calm robe of philosophical common sense. By calling differences in intellectual faculties "well known to philosophers", he’s not just observing human variety; he’s invoking an elite consensus as a kind of quiet enforcement. The line flatters the reader who counts themselves among the knowing, and it sidelines dissent as naivete. It’s an argument by atmosphere: you’re meant to feel that the conclusion is already settled in the minds that matter.
The intent is diagnostic but also administrative. Maimonides, writing in a medieval world where theology, law, and philosophy were braided together, is often preoccupied with who can handle which truths. The claim of "considerable difference" functions as a gatekeeping principle: some people can pursue abstract metaphysics, others need doctrine, ritual, and parable. That hierarchy isn’t incidental; it stabilizes a community. It justifies why revelation might be taught in layers, why commandments can be binding even when their rationales aren’t disclosed, why philosophical training becomes a moral filter rather than a mere academic preference.
The subtext is paternalistic, but not casually so. It’s a protective paternalism aimed at preventing confusion, heresy, or spiritual harm in an environment where wrong ideas were not private quirks but communal threats. Maimonides makes inequality of intellect sound like an obvious fact so he can build a pedagogy - and a politics of knowledge - on top of it without having to relitigate the premise.
The intent is diagnostic but also administrative. Maimonides, writing in a medieval world where theology, law, and philosophy were braided together, is often preoccupied with who can handle which truths. The claim of "considerable difference" functions as a gatekeeping principle: some people can pursue abstract metaphysics, others need doctrine, ritual, and parable. That hierarchy isn’t incidental; it stabilizes a community. It justifies why revelation might be taught in layers, why commandments can be binding even when their rationales aren’t disclosed, why philosophical training becomes a moral filter rather than a mere academic preference.
The subtext is paternalistic, but not casually so. It’s a protective paternalism aimed at preventing confusion, heresy, or spiritual harm in an environment where wrong ideas were not private quirks but communal threats. Maimonides makes inequality of intellect sound like an obvious fact so he can build a pedagogy - and a politics of knowledge - on top of it without having to relitigate the premise.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Maimonides
Add to List
