"Almost every day, instead of going to school, I made for the fields, where I spent my day"
About this Quote
A truancy confession that reads like a mission statement: Audubon frames his education not as something rejected, but rerouted. The sentence is built on a quiet swap of institutions. “Instead of going to school” sets up the expected path of a respectable young man; “I made for the fields” replaces classroom discipline with self-directed immersion. That verb, “made for,” carries intention and momentum, suggesting habit hardened into choice, not a one-off escapade.
Audubon’s subtext is a defense of an uncredentialed way of knowing. By emphasizing “almost every day,” he signals consistency, the kind that turns play into practice. He isn’t boasting about laziness; he’s claiming apprenticeship under a different authority: seasons, weather, animal behavior, the slow accumulation of attention. It’s also a retroactive legitimization of obsession. In the 19th century, “scientist” as a professional identity was still forming, and natural history often lived in the overlap between art, collecting, and gentlemanly pursuit. Audubon’s later fame depends on the idea that his eye was trained not by lectures but by long hours outdoors.
The line works because it compresses a whole cultural argument into a simple itinerary. School represents conformity, social advancement, and inherited expectations. The fields represent risk, solitude, and the kind of intimate observation that can’t be standardized. He’s telling you, plainly, that his life’s work began as a daily refusal - and that the refusal was productive. It’s an origin story that turns disobedience into method.
Audubon’s subtext is a defense of an uncredentialed way of knowing. By emphasizing “almost every day,” he signals consistency, the kind that turns play into practice. He isn’t boasting about laziness; he’s claiming apprenticeship under a different authority: seasons, weather, animal behavior, the slow accumulation of attention. It’s also a retroactive legitimization of obsession. In the 19th century, “scientist” as a professional identity was still forming, and natural history often lived in the overlap between art, collecting, and gentlemanly pursuit. Audubon’s later fame depends on the idea that his eye was trained not by lectures but by long hours outdoors.
The line works because it compresses a whole cultural argument into a simple itinerary. School represents conformity, social advancement, and inherited expectations. The fields represent risk, solitude, and the kind of intimate observation that can’t be standardized. He’s telling you, plainly, that his life’s work began as a daily refusal - and that the refusal was productive. It’s an origin story that turns disobedience into method.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by John
Add to List




