"Already this war on gangs in California is taking money from universities to build prisons, and the universities have some clout"
About this Quote
Hayden’s line is a pressure-point argument disguised as a budget note: the “war on gangs” isn’t just a policing strategy, it’s a political machine that reallocates the state’s future. By framing it as money siphoned from universities to build prisons, he makes the trade-off visceral and time-bound. You can feel the lever being pulled: invest in human capital or warehouse the fallout. The verb choice matters. “Taking” implies seizure, not democratic choice; it hints at a policy agenda that’s already slipped past public deliberation and into automatic pilot.
The kicker is the aside: “and the universities have some clout.” Hayden isn’t praising academia; he’s exposing how power is rationed. Universities, with donors, alumni, and institutional legitimacy, can fight back. The subtext is darker: if even they’re losing money to prison construction, what happens to schools, neighborhoods, and social services with less leverage? It’s an indictment of a state that responds to social breakdown with architecture and sentencing rather than prevention and opportunity.
Contextually, Hayden is speaking from inside California’s late-20th-century pivot toward punitive governance: gang panic, tough-on-crime campaigns, and the prison boom that expanded corrections budgets while higher education became more expensive and less accessible. The quote works because it ties moral consequence to a line item, then names the real battlefield: not crime versus safety, but constituencies versus the carceral state.
The kicker is the aside: “and the universities have some clout.” Hayden isn’t praising academia; he’s exposing how power is rationed. Universities, with donors, alumni, and institutional legitimacy, can fight back. The subtext is darker: if even they’re losing money to prison construction, what happens to schools, neighborhoods, and social services with less leverage? It’s an indictment of a state that responds to social breakdown with architecture and sentencing rather than prevention and opportunity.
Contextually, Hayden is speaking from inside California’s late-20th-century pivot toward punitive governance: gang panic, tough-on-crime campaigns, and the prison boom that expanded corrections budgets while higher education became more expensive and less accessible. The quote works because it ties moral consequence to a line item, then names the real battlefield: not crime versus safety, but constituencies versus the carceral state.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List
