"Also, when I didn't like something, I could keep my opinion to myself"
About this Quote
A tiny sentence with a grown-up sting: restraint isn’t presented as repression, but as a lost civic skill. MacNeil’s line lands because it refuses the modern assumption that every irritation deserves airtime. The “Also” implies a list of habits once considered normal, with this one offered almost casually, like remembering how you used to return library books on time. That offhand delivery is the point. He’s not thundering about “decline”; he’s noting a behavioral baseline that now reads as countercultural.
The subtext is generational and professional. As a journalist who helped define sober, authoritative broadcast news, MacNeil comes from a media ecosystem built on gates: editors, airtime limits, and standards of public relevance. In that world, keeping an opinion to yourself wasn’t just manners; it was an internal filter that separated private taste from public consequence. Today’s platforms invert the incentive structure. Attention rewards reaction, not reflection, and “having a take” is treated as participation. His phrasing, “when I didn’t like something,” is deliberately small-bore. Not injustice. Not corruption. Just dislike. He’s diagnosing a culture that turns minor displeasure into performance.
The intent isn’t to scold people into silence; it’s to reintroduce proportion. Not every annoyance is an identity, not every preference a principle, not every moment an argument. In eight plain words, he makes a case for discretion as social technology: the quiet choice that keeps communities from becoming endless comment sections.
The subtext is generational and professional. As a journalist who helped define sober, authoritative broadcast news, MacNeil comes from a media ecosystem built on gates: editors, airtime limits, and standards of public relevance. In that world, keeping an opinion to yourself wasn’t just manners; it was an internal filter that separated private taste from public consequence. Today’s platforms invert the incentive structure. Attention rewards reaction, not reflection, and “having a take” is treated as participation. His phrasing, “when I didn’t like something,” is deliberately small-bore. Not injustice. Not corruption. Just dislike. He’s diagnosing a culture that turns minor displeasure into performance.
The intent isn’t to scold people into silence; it’s to reintroduce proportion. Not every annoyance is an identity, not every preference a principle, not every moment an argument. In eight plain words, he makes a case for discretion as social technology: the quiet choice that keeps communities from becoming endless comment sections.
Quote Details
| Topic | Respect |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List



