"America and its allies are engaged in a war against a terrorist movement that spans all corners of the globe. It is sparked by radical ideologues that breed hatred, oppression, and violence against all of their declared enemies"
About this Quote
“Spans all corners of the globe” is doing the heavy lifting here: it turns terrorism from a set of discrete threats into an everywhere-war, a condition rather than an event. Kenny Marchant isn’t just describing danger; he’s enlarging the map so that nearly any battlefield, policy, or surveillance measure can be narrated as necessary. The phrasing has the familiar post-9/11 architecture: a borderless enemy, a moralized struggle, and a promise of clarity in a chaotic landscape.
The sentence splits the world into two clean categories: “America and its allies” on one side, “a terrorist movement” on the other. That coalition language matters. It frames U.S. action as multilateral and therefore legitimate, even when the practical decisions are American. The subtext is consent-building: if the threat is global and ideologically driven, then long timelines, expansive budgets, and exceptional powers start to feel like common sense rather than political choices.
“Radical ideologues that breed hatred, oppression, and violence” shifts the cause from geopolitics to pathology. The enemy is not responding to grievances or strategy; it is a contaminant that reproduces. That metaphor quietly discourages negotiation, narrows debate, and collapses distinctions between groups, regions, and motives. The line “against all of their declared enemies” is equally elastic: it suggests indiscriminate aggression, inviting the audience to see themselves as already targeted.
Contextually, this rhetoric echoes the War on Terror’s most durable move: define the conflict as civilizational and limitless, then treat dissent as naivete. It’s designed to harden unity at home, discipline ambiguity abroad, and keep the policy horizon permanently open.
The sentence splits the world into two clean categories: “America and its allies” on one side, “a terrorist movement” on the other. That coalition language matters. It frames U.S. action as multilateral and therefore legitimate, even when the practical decisions are American. The subtext is consent-building: if the threat is global and ideologically driven, then long timelines, expansive budgets, and exceptional powers start to feel like common sense rather than political choices.
“Radical ideologues that breed hatred, oppression, and violence” shifts the cause from geopolitics to pathology. The enemy is not responding to grievances or strategy; it is a contaminant that reproduces. That metaphor quietly discourages negotiation, narrows debate, and collapses distinctions between groups, regions, and motives. The line “against all of their declared enemies” is equally elastic: it suggests indiscriminate aggression, inviting the audience to see themselves as already targeted.
Contextually, this rhetoric echoes the War on Terror’s most durable move: define the conflict as civilizational and limitless, then treat dissent as naivete. It’s designed to harden unity at home, discipline ambiguity abroad, and keep the policy horizon permanently open.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Kenny
Add to List


