"America will be far safer if we reduce the chances of a terrorist attack in one of our cities than if we diminish the civil liberties of our own people"
About this Quote
Pelosi’s line is a neat piece of post-9/11 rhetorical judo: it takes the word “safer,” a term usually monopolized by hawkish arguments, and flips it into a warning about overreaction. The sentence is built as a trade-off, but the subtext is that it’s a false bargain. “Far safer” doesn’t just claim moral high ground; it asserts operational realism. She’s arguing that security isn’t primarily a product of domestic restriction, but of prevention: intelligence, diplomacy, policing, and targeted counterterror measures that actually reduce “the chances” of an attack.
The phrasing matters. “One of our cities” conjures a vivid, localized fear without naming a specific catastrophe, letting listeners project their own mental image of vulnerability. Then she pivots to “our own people,” a possessive that turns civil liberties from an abstract principle into a communal asset the government is obligated to protect. It’s a subtle rebuke to the idea that freedom is a luxury item you pawn when scared.
Contextually, this sits squarely in the long shadow of the Patriot Act debates and the broader era when surveillance expansion was sold as the price of safety. Pelosi’s intent is both policy and posture: to position Democrats as serious about counterterrorism while drawing a bright line against open-ended domestic power grabs. The sting is implicit: a country that hollows out its liberties in the name of security may end up with less of both, and with a government newly practiced in suspicion.
The phrasing matters. “One of our cities” conjures a vivid, localized fear without naming a specific catastrophe, letting listeners project their own mental image of vulnerability. Then she pivots to “our own people,” a possessive that turns civil liberties from an abstract principle into a communal asset the government is obligated to protect. It’s a subtle rebuke to the idea that freedom is a luxury item you pawn when scared.
Contextually, this sits squarely in the long shadow of the Patriot Act debates and the broader era when surveillance expansion was sold as the price of safety. Pelosi’s intent is both policy and posture: to position Democrats as serious about counterterrorism while drawing a bright line against open-ended domestic power grabs. The sting is implicit: a country that hollows out its liberties in the name of security may end up with less of both, and with a government newly practiced in suspicion.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Nancy
Add to List





