"Americans have been given goals to achieve in Iraq, but not the standards by which to measure progress. And the only assurance Americans have been given that we can reach those goals is to trust the President and his Administration at their word"
About this Quote
A politician’s sharpest weapon is often procedural: make the debate about metrics, not motives. Patrick J. Kennedy frames the Iraq effort as a kind of blank check written in patriotic ink. “Goals” without “standards” is more than a policy critique; it’s an accusation that the public is being managed, not informed. The line turns the language of mission and sacrifice into an audit demand: if you can’t measure progress, you can’t claim it, and you certainly can’t sell it.
The subtext is a warning about how modern war gets domesticated for an audience at home. By separating “goals” from “standards,” Kennedy points to the rhetorical trick that keeps unpopular conflicts afloat: endlessly adjustable benchmarks. Progress becomes a vibe, a talking point, a press conference. The most biting move is the shift to “trust.” Trust isn’t presented as a virtue here; it’s presented as the only remaining instrument of certainty when evidence is scarce. That “only assurance” phrasing is doing heavy lifting, implying an administration that asks for faith precisely where it owes proof.
Context matters: this is the post-9/11 Iraq era, when public support depended on official narratives about weapons, timelines, and “turning corners.” Kennedy isn’t just questioning competence; he’s questioning democratic accountability. The intent is to re-center the citizen as stakeholder, insisting that consent requires data, criteria, and transparent endpoints - not loyalty tests. In a democracy, “take our word for it” is not a strategy; it’s a symptom.
The subtext is a warning about how modern war gets domesticated for an audience at home. By separating “goals” from “standards,” Kennedy points to the rhetorical trick that keeps unpopular conflicts afloat: endlessly adjustable benchmarks. Progress becomes a vibe, a talking point, a press conference. The most biting move is the shift to “trust.” Trust isn’t presented as a virtue here; it’s presented as the only remaining instrument of certainty when evidence is scarce. That “only assurance” phrasing is doing heavy lifting, implying an administration that asks for faith precisely where it owes proof.
Context matters: this is the post-9/11 Iraq era, when public support depended on official narratives about weapons, timelines, and “turning corners.” Kennedy isn’t just questioning competence; he’s questioning democratic accountability. The intent is to re-center the citizen as stakeholder, insisting that consent requires data, criteria, and transparent endpoints - not loyalty tests. In a democracy, “take our word for it” is not a strategy; it’s a symptom.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Patrick
Add to List
