"Amnesty International continues to report that extra judicial tortures and murders continue. This is not democracy that we are exporting to Mexico, and this is certainly not what the Mexican workers signed up for"
About this Quote
Calling it “exporting” is the tell: Lynch frames U.S. involvement in Mexico not as neutral trade or diplomacy but as a product being shipped across the border, with all the moral liability that implies. The line pivots on an ugly mismatch between branding and outcome. “Democracy” is the label on the box; “extra judicial tortures and murders” are what’s inside. By citing Amnesty International, he borrows an external, human-rights authority to make the charge harder to dismiss as partisan noise. It’s a move designed for a congressional record: credible witness, unambiguous indictment.
The subtext is aimed at U.S. policy that ties economic integration and security cooperation to promises of reform. Mexico becomes the site where America’s self-image is stress-tested. Lynch’s syntax is blunt, almost prosecutorial, and the repetition of “continues” does a lot of work: abuse isn’t an aberration or a transitional phase; it’s persistent, normalized, tolerated. That word quietly implicates not only Mexican state actors but any partner willing to keep doing business as usual.
The final clause is a strategic shift from geopolitics to labor. “Mexican workers” turns a foreign-policy debate into a bread-and-butter moral argument about who pays the price for these arrangements. It evokes NAFTA-era expectations: that integration would mean jobs plus rights, not jobs under intimidation. Lynch’s intent isn’t just to condemn; it’s to revoke consent retroactively, suggesting the democratic mandate for these policies was never legitimately earned.
The subtext is aimed at U.S. policy that ties economic integration and security cooperation to promises of reform. Mexico becomes the site where America’s self-image is stress-tested. Lynch’s syntax is blunt, almost prosecutorial, and the repetition of “continues” does a lot of work: abuse isn’t an aberration or a transitional phase; it’s persistent, normalized, tolerated. That word quietly implicates not only Mexican state actors but any partner willing to keep doing business as usual.
The final clause is a strategic shift from geopolitics to labor. “Mexican workers” turns a foreign-policy debate into a bread-and-butter moral argument about who pays the price for these arrangements. It evokes NAFTA-era expectations: that integration would mean jobs plus rights, not jobs under intimidation. Lynch’s intent isn’t just to condemn; it’s to revoke consent retroactively, suggesting the democratic mandate for these policies was never legitimately earned.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Stephen
Add to List
