"An estimated 7 million illegal immigrants were residing in the United States in January 2000. This is double the size of the illegal immigrant population in January 1990 and constitutes 2.5 percent of the total U.S. population of just over 281 million"
About this Quote
Numbers like these aren’t offered as neutral facts; they’re deployed as a narrative with a built-in moral. Miller’s estimate is doing three things at once: establishing scale (“7 million”), manufacturing urgency through acceleration (“double... in 10 years”), and then translating the count into a share of the national body (“2.5 percent”). That last move matters most. Percentages don’t just inform; they insinuate proportions of belonging, suggesting a measurable strain on a finite “we.”
As a politician, Miller’s intent isn’t merely to describe immigration at the turn of the millennium, when post-1990s economic expansion and shifting enforcement regimes fueled public attention. It’s to make the issue legible in the language of governance: growth rates, population shares, and implied capacity. The subtext is that something is outpacing control. “Residing” sounds clinical, but paired with “illegal” it hints at an interior breach, a presence inside the home. The rhetoric invites the listener to feel that the state has been bypassed, and that the appropriate response is restoration: tighter borders, stricter law, firmer administrative authority.
The choice of “estimated” provides a thin shield against methodological dispute while still allowing the figure to function politically. Even the baseline comparison (1990) is strategic: it frames the 1990s as a decade of policy failure, regardless of the complexities driving migration. In 2000-era politics, this kind of statistical framing often served as preamble to enforcement-first agendas, turning demographic description into an argument for action.
As a politician, Miller’s intent isn’t merely to describe immigration at the turn of the millennium, when post-1990s economic expansion and shifting enforcement regimes fueled public attention. It’s to make the issue legible in the language of governance: growth rates, population shares, and implied capacity. The subtext is that something is outpacing control. “Residing” sounds clinical, but paired with “illegal” it hints at an interior breach, a presence inside the home. The rhetoric invites the listener to feel that the state has been bypassed, and that the appropriate response is restoration: tighter borders, stricter law, firmer administrative authority.
The choice of “estimated” provides a thin shield against methodological dispute while still allowing the figure to function politically. Even the baseline comparison (1990) is strategic: it frames the 1990s as a decade of policy failure, regardless of the complexities driving migration. In 2000-era politics, this kind of statistical framing often served as preamble to enforcement-first agendas, turning demographic description into an argument for action.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Gary
Add to List

