"An idol of the mind is as offensive to God as an idol of the hand"
About this Quote
The sting is in “offensive.” This isn’t about an innocent misunderstanding or a merely imperfect metaphor for the divine. It’s about a moral affront, the spiritual equivalent of counterfeiting allegiance. Tozer’s subtext is that theology itself can become a shelter for control. When God is reduced to a concept we can diagram, predict, or weaponize, the believer hasn’t gotten more reverent; they’ve gotten more proprietorial. The “mind” idol is often more durable than the handmade one precisely because it hides behind education, tradition, and sincerity.
Context matters: Tozer preached in mid-century North American evangelicalism, a world of rising consumer comfort, mass media religion, and strong confidence in systems - doctrinal, institutional, political. His warning lands as a critique of respectability faith: God domesticated into a mascot for our anxieties and ambitions. It’s less an abstract theological quip than a diagnostic of a culture that trades encounter for certainty, and worship for control.
Quote Details
| Topic | God |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Tozer, Aiden Wilson. (2026, January 16). An idol of the mind is as offensive to God as an idol of the hand. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/an-idol-of-the-mind-is-as-offensive-to-god-as-an-138617/
Chicago Style
Tozer, Aiden Wilson. "An idol of the mind is as offensive to God as an idol of the hand." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/an-idol-of-the-mind-is-as-offensive-to-god-as-an-138617/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"An idol of the mind is as offensive to God as an idol of the hand." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/an-idol-of-the-mind-is-as-offensive-to-god-as-an-138617/. Accessed 26 Feb. 2026.











