"And at that point, I think my experience in covering the subject helped me. I think editors felt comfortable with the idea of me telling this story because I had demonstrated that I know this business pretty well"
About this Quote
Competence, here, is less a brag than a passport. Hillenbrand is describing the quiet gatekeeping machinery of publishing and journalism: before you get to tell an ambitious story, you have to be legible to the people who control space, budget, and risk. Her repetition of "I think" reads as modesty on the surface, but it also signals how much of this process is inference and vibe. No one hands you a rubric for trust. You sense it accumulating, or not.
The key phrase is "editors felt comfortable". Comfort is a revealing standard. It implies that editorial decisions are not purely about originality or moral urgency; they're also about anxiety management. Can this writer handle the material without embarrassing the outlet? Will the reporting hold up? Will the narrative land? Hillenbrand frames her prior coverage as proof-of-work, a credential that substitutes for institutional affiliation or insider access. It's a subtle argument for expertise as earned familiarity: knowing "this business pretty well" means understanding not just the subject, but the ecosystem around it - sources, jargon, incentives, landmines.
Context matters, too. Hillenbrand's reputation rests on obsessive research and narrative authority, often built from a remove (she's famously private and has worked under constraints). That makes this reflection sharper: she isn't romanticizing talent; she's describing leverage. In a culture that loves the myth of the breakthrough, she points to the less glamorous truth: editors greenlight stories when they can predict you. Trust, in creative industries, is often just pattern recognition dressed up as judgment.
The key phrase is "editors felt comfortable". Comfort is a revealing standard. It implies that editorial decisions are not purely about originality or moral urgency; they're also about anxiety management. Can this writer handle the material without embarrassing the outlet? Will the reporting hold up? Will the narrative land? Hillenbrand frames her prior coverage as proof-of-work, a credential that substitutes for institutional affiliation or insider access. It's a subtle argument for expertise as earned familiarity: knowing "this business pretty well" means understanding not just the subject, but the ecosystem around it - sources, jargon, incentives, landmines.
Context matters, too. Hillenbrand's reputation rests on obsessive research and narrative authority, often built from a remove (she's famously private and has worked under constraints). That makes this reflection sharper: she isn't romanticizing talent; she's describing leverage. In a culture that loves the myth of the breakthrough, she points to the less glamorous truth: editors greenlight stories when they can predict you. Trust, in creative industries, is often just pattern recognition dressed up as judgment.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Laura
Add to List

