"And before our current legislature adjourns, we intend to become the first state of full and true choice by saying to every low and middle-income Hoosier family, if you think a non-government school is the right one for your child, you're as entitled to that option as any wealthy family; here's a voucher, go sign up"
About this Quote
Daniels builds a moral high ground around a policy that’s really about power: who gets to define “public” education, and who gets to pay for walking away from it. The line is engineered to sound like a civil-rights expansion - “full and true choice” - but its key move is to recast a collective institution as a consumer marketplace. Schooling isn’t framed as a shared civic promise; it’s a product, and the state’s job is to hand out purchasing power.
The intent is openly political and strategically populist. By centering “low and middle-income Hoosier” families, Daniels borrows the language of fairness to neutralize a common critique of vouchers: that they subsidize private education for people already positioned to access it. The phrase “as entitled…as any wealthy family” is a rhetorical trapdoor. It implies that the real injustice is unequal access to private options, not unequal investment in public ones. Equality becomes the right to exit, not the right to improve what everyone shares.
“Non-government school” does quiet but heavy ideological work. It doesn’t say “private” or “religious,” both of which carry baggage; it says “non-government,” turning the state into the villain and private institutions into freedom itself. And the urgency - “before our current legislature adjourns” - signals a blitz: get it done fast, frame it as historic, dare opponents to look like they’re denying poor families opportunity.
Context matters: in the early 2010s, Indiana became a national testing ground for aggressive conservative education reform. Daniels’ quote isn’t just selling vouchers; it’s selling a new definition of public responsibility.
The intent is openly political and strategically populist. By centering “low and middle-income Hoosier” families, Daniels borrows the language of fairness to neutralize a common critique of vouchers: that they subsidize private education for people already positioned to access it. The phrase “as entitled…as any wealthy family” is a rhetorical trapdoor. It implies that the real injustice is unequal access to private options, not unequal investment in public ones. Equality becomes the right to exit, not the right to improve what everyone shares.
“Non-government school” does quiet but heavy ideological work. It doesn’t say “private” or “religious,” both of which carry baggage; it says “non-government,” turning the state into the villain and private institutions into freedom itself. And the urgency - “before our current legislature adjourns” - signals a blitz: get it done fast, frame it as historic, dare opponents to look like they’re denying poor families opportunity.
Context matters: in the early 2010s, Indiana became a national testing ground for aggressive conservative education reform. Daniels’ quote isn’t just selling vouchers; it’s selling a new definition of public responsibility.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Mitch
Add to List
