"And finally, it was Deuteronomy that brought about the historical result of Josiah's reformation"
About this Quote
Wellhausen lands this line like a controlled detonation: not prophets, not kings, not some vague “spiritual awakening,” but a text did it. In attributing Josiah’s reform to Deuteronomy, he’s flattening what religious tradition often treats as divine drama into something more legible - and more unsettling - for modern historical method. Scripture isn’t merely reflecting reform; it’s engineering it. That inversion is the point.
The sentence also carries a quiet provocation about power. “Deuteronomy” stands in for a program: centralize worship in Jerusalem, delegitimize local shrines, consolidate authority under the monarchy and priesthood. By treating the book as the prime mover of a “historical result,” Wellhausen implies that the decisive actor in this moment of Israelite history is a political-theological document, one capable of reorganizing a society by claiming to recover an ancient mandate. The subtext is that “rediscovered” sacred texts can function as strategic instruments - retroactive constitutions with divine branding.
Context matters: Wellhausen is writing in the era when biblical criticism was turning the Bible into an archive to be dated, stratified, and explained, not simply believed. His broader Documentary Hypothesis positions Deuteronomy (and its associated “Deuteronomistic” history) as a late composition aligned with Josiah’s seventh-century BCE agenda. So the line is less a casual observation than a thesis statement: history in the Bible is not just narrated; it is produced, curated, and weaponized by the act of writing itself.
The sentence also carries a quiet provocation about power. “Deuteronomy” stands in for a program: centralize worship in Jerusalem, delegitimize local shrines, consolidate authority under the monarchy and priesthood. By treating the book as the prime mover of a “historical result,” Wellhausen implies that the decisive actor in this moment of Israelite history is a political-theological document, one capable of reorganizing a society by claiming to recover an ancient mandate. The subtext is that “rediscovered” sacred texts can function as strategic instruments - retroactive constitutions with divine branding.
Context matters: Wellhausen is writing in the era when biblical criticism was turning the Bible into an archive to be dated, stratified, and explained, not simply believed. His broader Documentary Hypothesis positions Deuteronomy (and its associated “Deuteronomistic” history) as a late composition aligned with Josiah’s seventh-century BCE agenda. So the line is less a casual observation than a thesis statement: history in the Bible is not just narrated; it is produced, curated, and weaponized by the act of writing itself.
Quote Details
| Topic | Bible |
|---|
More Quotes by Julius
Add to List

