"And I also see how this body influences external images: it gives back movement to them"
About this Quote
Bergson slips a philosophical grenade into an almost casual observation: your body is not a passive camera receiving the world, it is an engine that alters what the world can be for you. “External images” sounds like mere perception, but in Bergson’s vocabulary an image is the basic stuff of reality-as-experienced, not a private mental picture. The crucial twist is the body’s “influence”: it “gives back movement” to what it takes in. Perception, then, is less like representation and more like choreography.
The line carries Bergson’s broader rebellion against the late-19th-century temptation to treat consciousness as a kind of inner theater and the body as machinery. He’s arguing that the body is a center of action: it selects, delays, and redirects. The “giving back” implies reciprocity and feedback. You don’t just register motion in the world; you respond, and that response becomes part of the world’s next frame. The subtext is anti-determinist without lapsing into mysticism: freedom shows up not as disembodied will, but as the lived gap between stimulus and response.
Context matters: Bergson is writing against both mechanistic neuroscience and overly intellectualist philosophy. Movement is his signature obsession because it’s where static concepts fail. This sentence is doing rhetorical work: it yokes perception to agency, insisting that seeing is already a kind of doing. In a culture addicted to treating experience as content consumed, Bergson insists the body is a producer, not a screen.
The line carries Bergson’s broader rebellion against the late-19th-century temptation to treat consciousness as a kind of inner theater and the body as machinery. He’s arguing that the body is a center of action: it selects, delays, and redirects. The “giving back” implies reciprocity and feedback. You don’t just register motion in the world; you respond, and that response becomes part of the world’s next frame. The subtext is anti-determinist without lapsing into mysticism: freedom shows up not as disembodied will, but as the lived gap between stimulus and response.
Context matters: Bergson is writing against both mechanistic neuroscience and overly intellectualist philosophy. Movement is his signature obsession because it’s where static concepts fail. This sentence is doing rhetorical work: it yokes perception to agency, insisting that seeing is already a kind of doing. In a culture addicted to treating experience as content consumed, Bergson insists the body is a producer, not a screen.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Henri
Add to List







