"And I am also here to say that if something were to happen, we are prepared to respond swiftly, to respond effectively, and to respond strongly. That is our tradition as a country. And that is a tradition that we will uphold, regardless of any circumstance because this nation is one that is very, very strong and, indeed, extraordinarily resilient"
About this Quote
The power move here is the conditional: "if something were to happen". It’s a fog machine, not a forecast. Napolitano avoids naming a threat, which keeps options open while letting listeners supply their own dread. In the post-9/11 security era she helped define as Homeland Security Secretary, that vagueness is the point: you can’t be wrong about an unspecified danger, and you can justify readiness without revealing intelligence or admitting uncertainty.
The rhetoric is built on rhythmic escalation: "swiftly... effectively... strongly". Those adverbs do more than reassure; they stage competence as a performance, a promise that the state has rehearsed the crisis already. The repetition of "respond" is a subtle shift away from prevention. It concedes, without saying so, that absolute safety is not on offer. What the government can sell is control of the aftermath.
Then comes the invocation of "tradition", a word that smuggles exceptional measures into familiar clothing. By framing reaction as national heritage, she casts emergency response not as expansion of power but as continuity with an imagined American reflex: we endure, we retaliate, we rebuild. "Regardless of any circumstance" is the most revealing line: it pre-authorizes action under any scenario, creating rhetorical cover for decisions that might otherwise trigger debate about proportionality, civil liberties, or evidence.
The closing pile-up - "very, very strong... extraordinarily resilient" - is less information than mood management. It’s not meant to prove capacity; it’s meant to calm the public and deter adversaries by projecting inevitability: whatever you do, the machinery holds.
The rhetoric is built on rhythmic escalation: "swiftly... effectively... strongly". Those adverbs do more than reassure; they stage competence as a performance, a promise that the state has rehearsed the crisis already. The repetition of "respond" is a subtle shift away from prevention. It concedes, without saying so, that absolute safety is not on offer. What the government can sell is control of the aftermath.
Then comes the invocation of "tradition", a word that smuggles exceptional measures into familiar clothing. By framing reaction as national heritage, she casts emergency response not as expansion of power but as continuity with an imagined American reflex: we endure, we retaliate, we rebuild. "Regardless of any circumstance" is the most revealing line: it pre-authorizes action under any scenario, creating rhetorical cover for decisions that might otherwise trigger debate about proportionality, civil liberties, or evidence.
The closing pile-up - "very, very strong... extraordinarily resilient" - is less information than mood management. It’s not meant to prove capacity; it’s meant to calm the public and deter adversaries by projecting inevitability: whatever you do, the machinery holds.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Janet
Add to List


