"And I believe that public broadcasting has an important trust with the American people, it's an intimate medium of television, and that we can do reading and language development for young children without getting into human sexuality"
About this Quote
Spellings is trying to draw a bright, defensible line between “education” and “culture war,” and she does it by wrapping the line in the language of public trust. “Public broadcasting” isn’t just TV here; it’s a quasi-civic institution with obligations to parents, taxpayers, and the state. Calling it an “important trust with the American people” frames PBS as a steward of innocence and consensus, not a venue for contestation. That word “trust” quietly recruits viewers into a moral contract: if you fund this, you should be able to assume it won’t surprise you.
The phrase “intimate medium of television” is doing heavy lifting. Intimacy signals proximity to children and the home, a space where politics pretends it doesn’t belong. Spellings uses that intimacy to justify a kind of editorial paternalism: because TV enters your living room, it must avoid certain subjects. The subtext is less about pedagogy than about permission structures - who gets to introduce what, and when.
Her rhetorical move is also a containment strategy: “reading and language development” are positioned as neutral, universally acceptable goods, while “human sexuality” is treated as inherently partisan and age-inappropriate. The “without getting into” construction suggests contamination, as if sexuality is a needless detour from learning rather than a lived reality children encounter in families, identities, and health. In context - mid-2000s battles over children’s programming, LGBTQ representation, and “values” politics - Spellings isn’t merely protecting kids. She’s protecting an institution from backlash by narrowing its mandate to the safest possible version of public education.
The phrase “intimate medium of television” is doing heavy lifting. Intimacy signals proximity to children and the home, a space where politics pretends it doesn’t belong. Spellings uses that intimacy to justify a kind of editorial paternalism: because TV enters your living room, it must avoid certain subjects. The subtext is less about pedagogy than about permission structures - who gets to introduce what, and when.
Her rhetorical move is also a containment strategy: “reading and language development” are positioned as neutral, universally acceptable goods, while “human sexuality” is treated as inherently partisan and age-inappropriate. The “without getting into” construction suggests contamination, as if sexuality is a needless detour from learning rather than a lived reality children encounter in families, identities, and health. In context - mid-2000s battles over children’s programming, LGBTQ representation, and “values” politics - Spellings isn’t merely protecting kids. She’s protecting an institution from backlash by narrowing its mandate to the safest possible version of public education.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|
More Quotes by Margaret
Add to List
