"And it is essential that in fighting terrorism, sacrifices should not be made on democracy"
About this Quote
The line lands like a brake squeal in the middle of a chase: the point isn’t that terrorism is manageable, but that the state’s response can become its own kind of threat. Ecevit is warning about a familiar political temptation - to treat democracy as a luxury you can suspend until “security” returns - and he’s doing it with a strategic word choice. “Essential” frames civil liberties not as a moral preference but as a functional requirement. Democracies don’t just defend themselves with force; they defend themselves by refusing to become the thing they fear.
The subtext is aimed as much at governments as at militants. Terrorism is designed to provoke overreaction, to lure a democratic state into mass surveillance, indefinite detention, censorship, or emergency-rule politics that corrode trust. Ecevit’s phrasing, “sacrifices should not be made on democracy,” suggests an altar: democracy is what panicked leaders offer up to appear decisive. It’s also a quiet rebuke to voters who demand “whatever it takes,” then act surprised when the “whatever” sticks.
Context matters with Ecevit. As a Turkish prime minister in a country long wrestling with political violence, military tutelage, and the Kurdish conflict, he knew how quickly counterterror measures become permanent infrastructure. His intent isn’t naive idealism; it’s damage control for a fragile legitimacy. He’s arguing that winning the security battle while hollowing out democratic norms is still a strategic loss - because you hand extremists proof that ballots are theater and power is coercion.
The subtext is aimed as much at governments as at militants. Terrorism is designed to provoke overreaction, to lure a democratic state into mass surveillance, indefinite detention, censorship, or emergency-rule politics that corrode trust. Ecevit’s phrasing, “sacrifices should not be made on democracy,” suggests an altar: democracy is what panicked leaders offer up to appear decisive. It’s also a quiet rebuke to voters who demand “whatever it takes,” then act surprised when the “whatever” sticks.
Context matters with Ecevit. As a Turkish prime minister in a country long wrestling with political violence, military tutelage, and the Kurdish conflict, he knew how quickly counterterror measures become permanent infrastructure. His intent isn’t naive idealism; it’s damage control for a fragile legitimacy. He’s arguing that winning the security battle while hollowing out democratic norms is still a strategic loss - because you hand extremists proof that ballots are theater and power is coercion.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Bulent
Add to List





