"And my real enemy is not to hold the specimen sterile, but it's the lighting. The light is our real enemy. So we have to work with very very poor lighting. But we can increase the light with computers"
About this Quote
Nilsson frames the lab not as a temple of pristine control but as a battlefield where the villain is embarrassingly mundane: light. It is a photographer's heresy and a photographer's truth. In scientific imaging, illumination is never neutral; it is heat, radiation, disturbance. The brighter you make a scene, the more you risk changing the very life you claim to document. By calling light "our real enemy", he flips the usual anxiety of sterility into a more revealing fear: not contamination of the specimen, but contamination of the image by the act of seeing.
The line also smuggles in a quiet ethos of restraint. "Very very poor lighting" isn't a complaint so much as a moral constraint: the subject (often fetal life, in Nilsson's case) is fragile, and the photographer has to accept a kind of visual humility. You're not staging; you're negotiating. That repetition, "very very", sounds like the weary emphasis of someone who has tried every trick and learned where bravado fails.
Then comes the pivot: "But we can increase the light with computers". It's not sci-fi optimism; it's a practical manifesto for the late-20th-century shift from chemical photography to computational imaging. Instead of blasting more photons onto a living subject, you amplify signal after the fact: longer exposures, stacking, noise reduction, contrast enhancement. The subtext is that technology can make looking less violent. Nilsson is defending a new pact between aesthetics and ethics: let the computer do the brightening so the body doesn't have to pay for it.
The line also smuggles in a quiet ethos of restraint. "Very very poor lighting" isn't a complaint so much as a moral constraint: the subject (often fetal life, in Nilsson's case) is fragile, and the photographer has to accept a kind of visual humility. You're not staging; you're negotiating. That repetition, "very very", sounds like the weary emphasis of someone who has tried every trick and learned where bravado fails.
Then comes the pivot: "But we can increase the light with computers". It's not sci-fi optimism; it's a practical manifesto for the late-20th-century shift from chemical photography to computational imaging. Instead of blasting more photons onto a living subject, you amplify signal after the fact: longer exposures, stacking, noise reduction, contrast enhancement. The subtext is that technology can make looking less violent. Nilsson is defending a new pact between aesthetics and ethics: let the computer do the brightening so the body doesn't have to pay for it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Lennart
Add to List





