"And, perhaps most importantly, regional conflicts will again and again confront us with a cruel choice between costly engagement and costly indifference"
About this Quote
The remark recognizes a stubborn reality of international politics: when violence erupts within a region, outsiders seldom enjoy a tidy, cost-free option. Stepping in demands money, lives, political capital, and the risk of unintended consequences. Standing aside incurs a different bill, measured in human catastrophe, spillovers across borders, eroded norms, and emboldened aggressors who learn that the world will look away. The choice is cruel because both paths ask for payment, just in different currencies and at different times.
The phrase again and again speaks to the recurrences Robertson saw firsthand. As UK Defence Secretary and later NATO Secretary General, he wrestled with the legacies of Bosnia and Rwanda, the intervention in Kosovo, and the upheaval after 9/11. In each case, the pressure mounted to act, while memories of past overreach warned against it. Engagement can be costly mission creep; indifference can be Srebrenica. Neither is morally or strategically clean.
Regional conflicts rarely stay regional. Refugee flows, cross-border militias, pandemics of disinformation, and energy shocks ripple outward. What begins as a local struggle can, through alliance commitments and market interdependence, draw in faraway publics who thought they could remain untouched. The harsh lesson is that delay often shifts costs from the present to the future, where they accumulate interest.
The observation also punctures the fantasy of perfect solutions. Policymakers must weigh imperfect tools: targeted sanctions, arms embargoes, peacekeeping mandates, no-fly zones, humanitarian corridors, and, at times, force. The task is to make engagement as smart and limited as possible while making the costs of indifference visible and politically honest. Investing in prevention, early warning, diplomacy, and burden-sharing does not erase the dilemma, but it narrows it.
Ultimately the real decision is not whether to pay, but when, how, and for what. Leadership lies in admitting the bill exists, aligning means with ends, and choosing the form of cost that best serves both conscience and security.
The phrase again and again speaks to the recurrences Robertson saw firsthand. As UK Defence Secretary and later NATO Secretary General, he wrestled with the legacies of Bosnia and Rwanda, the intervention in Kosovo, and the upheaval after 9/11. In each case, the pressure mounted to act, while memories of past overreach warned against it. Engagement can be costly mission creep; indifference can be Srebrenica. Neither is morally or strategically clean.
Regional conflicts rarely stay regional. Refugee flows, cross-border militias, pandemics of disinformation, and energy shocks ripple outward. What begins as a local struggle can, through alliance commitments and market interdependence, draw in faraway publics who thought they could remain untouched. The harsh lesson is that delay often shifts costs from the present to the future, where they accumulate interest.
The observation also punctures the fantasy of perfect solutions. Policymakers must weigh imperfect tools: targeted sanctions, arms embargoes, peacekeeping mandates, no-fly zones, humanitarian corridors, and, at times, force. The task is to make engagement as smart and limited as possible while making the costs of indifference visible and politically honest. Investing in prevention, early warning, diplomacy, and burden-sharing does not erase the dilemma, but it narrows it.
Ultimately the real decision is not whether to pay, but when, how, and for what. Leadership lies in admitting the bill exists, aligning means with ends, and choosing the form of cost that best serves both conscience and security.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Lord
Add to List
