"And preserving our open spaces or having them there for recreational purposes is one of the things that contributes to the high level of quality of life that we offer in Pennsylvania, and that also translates into economic benefits"
About this Quote
Rendell is doing the politician’s two-step: take something that sounds like a “nice to have” and reframe it as core infrastructure. “Open spaces” and “recreational purposes” cue wholesomeness and civic pride, but the real work happens in the pivot from quality of life to “economic benefits.” That phrase is a permission slip aimed at skeptical taxpayers, developers, and business-minded legislators: conservation isn’t just sentimentality or a luxury for affluent suburbs, it’s an investment with returns.
The intent is coalition-building. By stacking “preserving” alongside “having them there,” Rendell widens the tent to include both land protection and public access, sidestepping the old fight between pure conservation and active use. “We offer in Pennsylvania” frames the state as a product in a competitive market, echoing the era’s economic-development logic: talent and capital are mobile; states win by offering livable places, not just low taxes.
The subtext is also defensive. Open-space policy often draws accusations of restricting growth or elevating scenic priorities over jobs. Rendell anticipates that critique by translating green space into a ledger entry: tourism revenue, higher adjacent property values, reduced public health costs, and the kind of place-branding that helps cities recruit employers and retain young professionals. It’s public policy dressed in pragmatic language, insisting that environment and economy aren’t opponents but mutually reinforcing. In a state defined by post-industrial transitions and contested land use, that framing is less poetic than strategic.
The intent is coalition-building. By stacking “preserving” alongside “having them there,” Rendell widens the tent to include both land protection and public access, sidestepping the old fight between pure conservation and active use. “We offer in Pennsylvania” frames the state as a product in a competitive market, echoing the era’s economic-development logic: talent and capital are mobile; states win by offering livable places, not just low taxes.
The subtext is also defensive. Open-space policy often draws accusations of restricting growth or elevating scenic priorities over jobs. Rendell anticipates that critique by translating green space into a ledger entry: tourism revenue, higher adjacent property values, reduced public health costs, and the kind of place-branding that helps cities recruit employers and retain young professionals. It’s public policy dressed in pragmatic language, insisting that environment and economy aren’t opponents but mutually reinforcing. In a state defined by post-industrial transitions and contested land use, that framing is less poetic than strategic.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|
More Quotes by Ed
Add to List
