"And, since the model he faithfully copies is not going to be hung up next to the picture, since the picture is going to be there on its own, it is of no interest whether it is an accurate copy of the model"
About this Quote
Freud’s line is a quiet demolition of the idea that painting is a court stenographer’s job. He’s pointing out the obvious fact we politely ignore: the “model” is absent from the final encounter. In a gallery, no one checks the painting against the living person like a forensic match. The image has to survive alone, as its own object, with its own internal logic. Accuracy, in that setting, isn’t just secondary; it’s almost a category error.
The subtext is Freud staking a claim for painting’s autonomy at a moment when photography had already cornered the market on likeness. If the camera can deliver faithful resemblance on demand, the painter’s value shifts to what resemblance can’t certify: the sensation of presence, the friction of flesh, the psychology carried in posture and skin. Freud’s portraits are notorious for their unflattering candor, but this remark clarifies that “unflattering” isn’t the point. He’s less interested in flattering the sitter than in making a painting that feels incontrovertibly there.
Context matters: postwar British figurative painting, with Freud positioned against both academic idealization and easy expressionist drama. His realism is stubborn, but it’s not documentary. The intent is to free the artist from the moralizing demand to “capture” someone correctly and to replace it with a harsher, more modern criterion: does the painting convince as an independent reality? If it does, the model becomes the starting material, not the standard of judgment.
The subtext is Freud staking a claim for painting’s autonomy at a moment when photography had already cornered the market on likeness. If the camera can deliver faithful resemblance on demand, the painter’s value shifts to what resemblance can’t certify: the sensation of presence, the friction of flesh, the psychology carried in posture and skin. Freud’s portraits are notorious for their unflattering candor, but this remark clarifies that “unflattering” isn’t the point. He’s less interested in flattering the sitter than in making a painting that feels incontrovertibly there.
Context matters: postwar British figurative painting, with Freud positioned against both academic idealization and easy expressionist drama. His realism is stubborn, but it’s not documentary. The intent is to free the artist from the moralizing demand to “capture” someone correctly and to replace it with a harsher, more modern criterion: does the painting convince as an independent reality? If it does, the model becomes the starting material, not the standard of judgment.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Lucian
Add to List


