"And the basis on which we agreed to operate with them involved a manifesto, where it states that we proceed from different ideologies and policies. One thing that we insisted on was that they should take an oath to reject racism and discrimination"
About this Quote
Coalition talk, dressed up as moral housekeeping. Buthelezi is describing a bargain that South Africans in the early 1990s saw repeatedly: uneasy partnerships in a country trying to rewire itself, where the price of entry into the new political game had to include a public break with the old one. The “manifesto” functions as both contract and alibi. By foregrounding “different ideologies and policies,” he signals pluralism and pragmatism, but also pre-empts accusations of selling out. This is collaboration framed not as surrender, but as managed difference.
The sharpest move is the oath. An “oath to reject racism and discrimination” is performative language with real political uses. It’s a gatekeeping mechanism, a way to draw a bright line between legitimate opponents and toxic fellow travelers. It also shifts the burden: the other party must prove cleanliness, while Buthelezi positions himself as custodian of the new norms. In a transitional moment, legitimacy is currency, and he’s setting the exchange rate.
There’s subtext in the modesty of “one thing that we insisted on.” It underplays how central that insistence is, which makes the demand sound reasonable rather than punitive. Yet it also hints at suspicion: an oath is required when trust isn’t. Buthelezi’s rhetoric reflects the tension of the era - negotiating across deep divides while refusing to let “unity” become a laundering operation. The line is less about moral purity than about ensuring that the future’s public language is incompatible with apartheid’s private habits.
The sharpest move is the oath. An “oath to reject racism and discrimination” is performative language with real political uses. It’s a gatekeeping mechanism, a way to draw a bright line between legitimate opponents and toxic fellow travelers. It also shifts the burden: the other party must prove cleanliness, while Buthelezi positions himself as custodian of the new norms. In a transitional moment, legitimacy is currency, and he’s setting the exchange rate.
There’s subtext in the modesty of “one thing that we insisted on.” It underplays how central that insistence is, which makes the demand sound reasonable rather than punitive. Yet it also hints at suspicion: an oath is required when trust isn’t. Buthelezi’s rhetoric reflects the tension of the era - negotiating across deep divides while refusing to let “unity” become a laundering operation. The line is less about moral purity than about ensuring that the future’s public language is incompatible with apartheid’s private habits.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Mangosuthu
Add to List



