"And this week, I am proposing legislation to strengthen our Open Records laws to make public access to our public records surer, faster, and more comprehensive"
About this Quote
A politician promising to make records access "surer, faster, and more comprehensive" is doing two things at once: announcing a policy and laundering a reputation. Roy Barnes frames transparency as simple infrastructure work, the civic equivalent of widening a highway. The phrase "this week" is the tell. It pins the pledge to an immediate news cycle, signaling urgency and control, while quietly implying that whatever prompted this moment (a scandal, investigative pressure, public mistrust) can be handled through managerial competence.
Barnes' wording also performs a neat rhetorical pivot: "our Open Records laws" and "our public records" folds the audience into ownership. It's inclusive language that defuses suspicion; if the records are "ours", anyone objecting sounds anti-public. But the subtext is that access has not been sure or fast. "Strengthen" acknowledges weakness without assigning blame. It's accountability without culpability, reform without an admission of wrongdoing.
The triple beat - surer, faster, more comprehensive - reads like a service guarantee, not a power shift. That matters because open records laws are rarely about abstract openness; they're about who gets to see what, when, and with what friction. Bureaucracies don't usually hide behind locked doors anymore; they hide behind delays, fees, exemptions, and redactions. Barnes is promising to target those choke points, or at least to be seen targeting them.
In the broader context of late-20th-century state politics, transparency talk often functions as inoculation: reassure voters that government can police itself, so they don't demand harsher external oversight. The promise works because it turns scrutiny into a deliverable.
Barnes' wording also performs a neat rhetorical pivot: "our Open Records laws" and "our public records" folds the audience into ownership. It's inclusive language that defuses suspicion; if the records are "ours", anyone objecting sounds anti-public. But the subtext is that access has not been sure or fast. "Strengthen" acknowledges weakness without assigning blame. It's accountability without culpability, reform without an admission of wrongdoing.
The triple beat - surer, faster, more comprehensive - reads like a service guarantee, not a power shift. That matters because open records laws are rarely about abstract openness; they're about who gets to see what, when, and with what friction. Bureaucracies don't usually hide behind locked doors anymore; they hide behind delays, fees, exemptions, and redactions. Barnes is promising to target those choke points, or at least to be seen targeting them.
In the broader context of late-20th-century state politics, transparency talk often functions as inoculation: reassure voters that government can police itself, so they don't demand harsher external oversight. The promise works because it turns scrutiny into a deliverable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Roy
Add to List

