"And who is any of us, that without starvation he can go through the kingdoms of starvation?"
About this Quote
Long’s line needles the comfortable with a moral paradox: you can’t tour deprivation like a landscape and come back unscarred. “Kingdoms of starvation” is a deliberately imperial metaphor, turning hunger into a governed realm with borders, rulers, and customs. It’s not just that starvation exists; it’s organized, persistent, political. And the traveler who “go[es] through” it is implicitly someone with the privilege to pass through at all.
The barb is in the opening challenge: “And who is any of us.” Long collapses status and certainty into a brusque accounting of bodies. Unless you’ve known hunger in your own tissues, what right do you have to speak with authority about its terrain? The phrasing “without starvation” does double duty: it names literal deprivation, but also suggests a kind of spiritual inoculation the well-fed assume they possess. Long denies that immunity. Sympathy can be sincere, reportage can be accurate, reform can be well-intentioned, but there’s an experiential threshold you cannot cross by observation alone.
Contextually, Long writes in a world shadowed by the Great Depression and two world wars, when mass hunger was not metaphor but daily arithmetic. The sentence reads like a warning aimed at writers, policymakers, and philanthropists: don’t mistake proximity for understanding, or charity for comprehension. It’s not anti-empathy; it’s anti-tourism. Long insists that starvation isn’t a story you “cover.” It’s a condition that reorders language, ethics, and what you imagine you deserve.
The barb is in the opening challenge: “And who is any of us.” Long collapses status and certainty into a brusque accounting of bodies. Unless you’ve known hunger in your own tissues, what right do you have to speak with authority about its terrain? The phrasing “without starvation” does double duty: it names literal deprivation, but also suggests a kind of spiritual inoculation the well-fed assume they possess. Long denies that immunity. Sympathy can be sincere, reportage can be accurate, reform can be well-intentioned, but there’s an experiential threshold you cannot cross by observation alone.
Contextually, Long writes in a world shadowed by the Great Depression and two world wars, when mass hunger was not metaphor but daily arithmetic. The sentence reads like a warning aimed at writers, policymakers, and philanthropists: don’t mistake proximity for understanding, or charity for comprehension. It’s not anti-empathy; it’s anti-tourism. Long insists that starvation isn’t a story you “cover.” It’s a condition that reorders language, ethics, and what you imagine you deserve.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Haniel
Add to List
