"And you can't really cover people critically that you're friends with"
About this Quote
Journalism’s favorite alibi is objectivity; Loder’s line exposes the more embarrassing truth: access is an emotion before it’s a credential. “Can’t really” does a lot of work here. It’s not a purist claim that friendship automatically corrupts every sentence, but a blunt admission that the incentives bend the spine. Friendship makes critique feel like betrayal, and in media industries built on proximity - backstage passes, green rooms, “text me when you land” - proximity is currency.
The quote is also a quiet rebuke of the celebrity-press ecosystem Loder helped define in the MTV era, where the line between reporter and participant was designed to blur. If you’re embedded enough to be “friends,” you’re already inside the narrative the subject wants sold: loyal, flattering, mutually beneficial. The real subtext is that bias isn’t only ideological; it’s interpersonal. You don’t just fear getting a fact wrong. You fear being iced out, losing the relationship, becoming the person who “went negative.” That pressure produces a softer kind of censorship: omitting the ugly detail, rounding off the sharp edge, asking the safe question.
Loder’s intent reads less like moral grandstanding than like a disclosure statement: here is the conflict of interest we pretend is manageable with professionalism alone. It lands because it treats criticism as a human act, not a mechanical one. The most corrosive compromise isn’t lying; it’s the slow conversion of scrutiny into companionship, until “coverage” becomes a favor.
The quote is also a quiet rebuke of the celebrity-press ecosystem Loder helped define in the MTV era, where the line between reporter and participant was designed to blur. If you’re embedded enough to be “friends,” you’re already inside the narrative the subject wants sold: loyal, flattering, mutually beneficial. The real subtext is that bias isn’t only ideological; it’s interpersonal. You don’t just fear getting a fact wrong. You fear being iced out, losing the relationship, becoming the person who “went negative.” That pressure produces a softer kind of censorship: omitting the ugly detail, rounding off the sharp edge, asking the safe question.
Loder’s intent reads less like moral grandstanding than like a disclosure statement: here is the conflict of interest we pretend is manageable with professionalism alone. It lands because it treats criticism as a human act, not a mechanical one. The most corrosive compromise isn’t lying; it’s the slow conversion of scrutiny into companionship, until “coverage” becomes a favor.
Quote Details
| Topic | Friendship |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Kurt
Add to List




