"Animals, whom we have made our slaves, we do not like to consider our equal"
About this Quote
The phrasing matters. “Whom we have made” shifts the burden from nature to culture. Animals aren’t “slaves” because they’re inherently lesser; they’ve been placed there by human systems and human force. That’s a subtle but devastating flip for the Victorian era, when empire and hierarchy were treated as the natural order. Darwin’s theory was already dissolving the boundary between human and animal; this sentence sharpens that dissolution into an ethical problem. If humans are not a separate creation but a branch on the same evolutionary tree, then superiority becomes less a fact than a preference.
The subtext is also about denial. People don’t “disagree,” they “do not like to consider.” Darwin diagnoses the emotional gatekeeping that props up exploitation: we avert our eyes, tidy our language, and call domination “husbandry” or “science.” It’s an early sketch of a modern insight: power doesn’t just control bodies; it edits perception so inequality can feel normal.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Darwin, Charles. (2026, January 15). Animals, whom we have made our slaves, we do not like to consider our equal. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/animals-whom-we-have-made-our-slaves-we-do-not-30480/
Chicago Style
Darwin, Charles. "Animals, whom we have made our slaves, we do not like to consider our equal." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/animals-whom-we-have-made-our-slaves-we-do-not-30480/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Animals, whom we have made our slaves, we do not like to consider our equal." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/animals-whom-we-have-made-our-slaves-we-do-not-30480/. Accessed 7 Feb. 2026.




