"Any dictator would admire the uniformity and obedience of the U.S. media"
About this Quote
It lands like an insult disguised as comparative politics: the U.S. press may not be state-owned, Chomsky implies, but it can still behave with the pleasing predictability of a mouthpiece. The jab works because it flips a civic reflex. Americans tend to measure media freedom by the absence of official censors; Chomsky asks you to measure it by outcomes: how often power gets seriously rattled, how wide the range of “acceptable” debate really is, how quickly dissenting frames get treated as unserious or unpatriotic.
The phrase “uniformity and obedience” is doing double duty. “Uniformity” points to sameness across outlets that are supposedly competing: shared narratives, synchronized priorities, identical expert rosters, the same handful of assumptions smuggled in as common sense. “Obedience” is sharper: it suggests not mere groupthink but discipline, a habit of preemptive compliance. No jackboots required when careers, access, and advertising incentives teach journalists which questions get you invited back and which get you frozen out.
Context matters: Chomsky’s media critique (notably around the “manufacturing consent” framework) isn’t that reporters are cartoon villains; it’s that institutional pressures make certain truths expensive. During wartime, national security scares, or moments of elite consensus, those pressures intensify, and the boundaries of debate harden. The provocation is meant to embarrass complacency: if propaganda is only something dictators do, a market-driven press gets to stop interrogating its own blind spots. Chomsky’s line denies that comfort by suggesting the most effective control is the kind that looks like normal.
The phrase “uniformity and obedience” is doing double duty. “Uniformity” points to sameness across outlets that are supposedly competing: shared narratives, synchronized priorities, identical expert rosters, the same handful of assumptions smuggled in as common sense. “Obedience” is sharper: it suggests not mere groupthink but discipline, a habit of preemptive compliance. No jackboots required when careers, access, and advertising incentives teach journalists which questions get you invited back and which get you frozen out.
Context matters: Chomsky’s media critique (notably around the “manufacturing consent” framework) isn’t that reporters are cartoon villains; it’s that institutional pressures make certain truths expensive. During wartime, national security scares, or moments of elite consensus, those pressures intensify, and the boundaries of debate harden. The provocation is meant to embarrass complacency: if propaganda is only something dictators do, a market-driven press gets to stop interrogating its own blind spots. Chomsky’s line denies that comfort by suggesting the most effective control is the kind that looks like normal.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Noam
Add to List





