"Any people attempting to govern themselves by laws of their own making, and by officers of their own appointment, are in direct rebellion against the kingdom of God"
About this Quote
There is a cold audacity in Pratt's claim: self-government is not merely a political choice but a theological crime. By defining civic autonomy as "direct rebellion", he collapses the distance between ballot box and blasphemy, turning a dispute about authority into a test of salvation. The line works because it steals legitimacy from its target in advance. If the "kingdom of God" is the only rightful sovereign, then constitutional government becomes, by definition, a rival church.
Pratt is writing as a 19th-century Mormon theologian in a United States that often treated his community as suspicious, alien, and politically unruly. That pressure helps explain the quote's sharpness: it is defensive and expansionist at once. Defensive, because it frames persecution and conflict as spiritual warfare rather than human politics. Expansionist, because it suggests a comprehensive theocracy where divine order is meant to outgrow the nation-state, not coexist with it.
The subtext is also disciplinary. "Laws of their own making" and "officers of their own appointment" are pointed phrases: they indict the Enlightenment premise that legitimacy flows upward from the governed. Pratt flips that premise into a story of pride - humans crowning themselves. It is a rhetorical power move aimed at believers who might be tempted by American civic ideals: choosing secular institutions isn't neutral; it's apostasy.
Read today, it’s less a policy argument than a warning label on democracy: do-it-yourself sovereignty is a spiritual counterfeit, and God does not share jurisdiction.
Pratt is writing as a 19th-century Mormon theologian in a United States that often treated his community as suspicious, alien, and politically unruly. That pressure helps explain the quote's sharpness: it is defensive and expansionist at once. Defensive, because it frames persecution and conflict as spiritual warfare rather than human politics. Expansionist, because it suggests a comprehensive theocracy where divine order is meant to outgrow the nation-state, not coexist with it.
The subtext is also disciplinary. "Laws of their own making" and "officers of their own appointment" are pointed phrases: they indict the Enlightenment premise that legitimacy flows upward from the governed. Pratt flips that premise into a story of pride - humans crowning themselves. It is a rhetorical power move aimed at believers who might be tempted by American civic ideals: choosing secular institutions isn't neutral; it's apostasy.
Read today, it’s less a policy argument than a warning label on democracy: do-it-yourself sovereignty is a spiritual counterfeit, and God does not share jurisdiction.
Quote Details
| Topic | God |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Orson
Add to List








