"Any plan of administration which contemplates a concentrating of responsibility is open to the dangers which follow the creation of a bureaucracy"

Arthur Capper's quote, "Any plan of administration which contemplates a concentrating of responsibility is open to the dangers which follow the creation of a bureaucracy", highlights the prospective mistakes and intrinsic dangers related to centralizing power and obligations in a bureaucratic system. This quote encapsulates a traditional review of administration, suggesting that while centralization may simplify decision-making processes, it can also result in significant disadvantages.

The expression "pondering a focusing of duty" refers to administrative strategies where decision-making authority and responsibility are pooled into a single centralized entity or group. While this can in theory lead to more effective governance by minimizing redundancy and simplifying procedures, Capper warns that it can likewise present risks frequently connected with administration.

Administration frequently carries unfavorable connotations despite its organizational need in big systems. It is associated with red tape, slow decision-making, rigidness, and an inflexible adherence to rules. Capper's caution is that focusing too much responsibility into a central administration can exacerbate these problems. The "risks" he describes most likely include ineffectiveness, absence of responsibility, and minimized responsiveness to private requirements due to the slow and cumbersome nature of large administrative structures.

Moreover, when duty is centralized, it can lead to a detach in between administrators and those they serve, leading to choices that might not effectively reflect on-the-ground realities. It also creates the potential for power to be mistreated or misused, as fewer checks and balances might exist when less individuals or groups hold considerable sway over outcomes.

In a broader sense, Capper's statement functions as a caution against over-centralization. It advocates for a balance where responsibilities are dispersed in such a method that permits decentralization and versatility, allowing for more adaptive and responsive governance structures that can better fulfill the needs of constituents without falling under the traps of administrative inefficiency.