"Any political system can commit mistakes and any state can commit mistakes. What is most important is to acknowledge these mistakes and put them right as soon as possible and put those behind them into account, bring them to account"
About this Quote
Mubarak’s line reads like a safety manual for power: errors happen, the real test is accountability. It’s a reassuring frame, and it’s doing a lot of work. By calling abuses “mistakes,” he shrinks politics into administration - as if repression, corruption, or rigged elections are merely faulty procedures needing correction. The phrasing spreads responsibility thin (“any political system,” “any state”), a classic move for leaders who want to sound principled without naming what, exactly, they’re responsible for.
The rhetorical trick is the pivot from inevitability to virtue. If mistakes are universal, then the leader who “acknowledges” them becomes the mature adult in the room. Yet the sentence never identifies who must acknowledge them, who has the authority to “put them right,” or what “bring them to account” actually entails: courts, parliament, a free press, elections? In authoritarian contexts, accountability is often staged, selective, or aimed downward. The quote keeps those mechanisms conveniently abstract.
Context matters because Mubarak governed Egypt for nearly three decades under emergency laws that normalized arbitrary detention and narrowed political life. Read against that record, the statement sounds less like a commitment and more like reputational insurance: a democratic-sounding ethic that can be invoked whenever criticism mounts, without conceding structural wrongdoing. It’s the language of reform without the risk of reform, calibrated to satisfy international audiences and domestic moderates alike.
Its intent, then, is stabilizing: preserve the state’s legitimacy by admitting fallibility in theory while avoiding culpability in practice. The subtext is simple: trust the system - and, by extension, trust the man overseeing it - to correct itself.
The rhetorical trick is the pivot from inevitability to virtue. If mistakes are universal, then the leader who “acknowledges” them becomes the mature adult in the room. Yet the sentence never identifies who must acknowledge them, who has the authority to “put them right,” or what “bring them to account” actually entails: courts, parliament, a free press, elections? In authoritarian contexts, accountability is often staged, selective, or aimed downward. The quote keeps those mechanisms conveniently abstract.
Context matters because Mubarak governed Egypt for nearly three decades under emergency laws that normalized arbitrary detention and narrowed political life. Read against that record, the statement sounds less like a commitment and more like reputational insurance: a democratic-sounding ethic that can be invoked whenever criticism mounts, without conceding structural wrongdoing. It’s the language of reform without the risk of reform, calibrated to satisfy international audiences and domestic moderates alike.
Its intent, then, is stabilizing: preserve the state’s legitimacy by admitting fallibility in theory while avoiding culpability in practice. The subtext is simple: trust the system - and, by extension, trust the man overseeing it - to correct itself.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Hosni
Add to List

