"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic"
About this Quote
Clarke’s line lands like a compliment to science, then twists into a warning about power and perception. It flatters the engineer’s dream - build something so elegant it feels supernatural - while quietly admitting how easily awe becomes ignorance. “Indistinguishable” is the knife: the issue isn’t that technology becomes magical, but that human observers lose the ability to tell the difference between mechanism and miracle. That gap is where myth, cults of personality, and bad politics breed.
The context matters. Clarke wasn’t a mystic; he was a futurist with a soldering iron, writing in the mid-20th century when rockets, radar, nuclear weapons, and early computing made yesterday’s certainties look childish. His famous “Three Laws” were partly a corrective to smug skepticism: don’t mock ancient people for believing in gods when you’d likely kneel before a smartphone if you couldn’t peek under the hood. It’s also a dig at modern arrogance: we’re not immune to enchantment; we’ve just upgraded the props.
The subtext reads even sharper now. Corporations sell “magic” as a product category: frictionless apps, black-box algorithms, AI systems that can’t or won’t explain themselves. Clarke’s aphorism helps diagnose why that branding works - complexity plus opacity produces reverence. It’s a neat encapsulation of a cultural bargain: we trade understanding for convenience, then act surprised when the people who control the “magic” control us.
The context matters. Clarke wasn’t a mystic; he was a futurist with a soldering iron, writing in the mid-20th century when rockets, radar, nuclear weapons, and early computing made yesterday’s certainties look childish. His famous “Three Laws” were partly a corrective to smug skepticism: don’t mock ancient people for believing in gods when you’d likely kneel before a smartphone if you couldn’t peek under the hood. It’s also a dig at modern arrogance: we’re not immune to enchantment; we’ve just upgraded the props.
The subtext reads even sharper now. Corporations sell “magic” as a product category: frictionless apps, black-box algorithms, AI systems that can’t or won’t explain themselves. Clarke’s aphorism helps diagnose why that branding works - complexity plus opacity produces reverence. It’s a neat encapsulation of a cultural bargain: we trade understanding for convenience, then act surprised when the people who control the “magic” control us.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|---|
| Source | Unverified source: Profiles of the Future: An Inquiry into the Limits of the... (Arthur C. Clarke, 1973)
Evidence: Essay/Chapter: "Hazards of Prophecy: The Failure of Imagination" (page varies by edition). The best-supported PRIMARY source for the exact wording “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic” is Arthur C. Clarke’s own book Profiles of the Future, specifically the revised... Other candidates (2) Arthur C. Clarke (Arthur C. Clarke) compilation98.1% hird law any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic profile The Magic of Harry Potter (Daniel Mitchell, 2007) compilation95.0% ... Arthur C. Clarke is famous for his statement that “ Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable fro... |
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List





