"Anybody who runs for president in this country and comes out as strong as the Democrats were about helping the poor folks and black folks is not going to win"
About this Quote
It lands like a cold strategy memo spoken aloud: moral clarity may be admirable, but in American presidential politics it can be a losing bet. Charles Evers isn’t praising timidity; he’s diagnosing an electorate and a system that punish candidates who sound too explicitly committed to the poor and to Black Americans. The line’s bluntness is the point. It refuses the comforting fiction that progress fails because it isn’t explained well enough. Evers implies it fails because it threatens the hierarchy too directly.
The phrasing matters. “Comes out as strong” suggests not just policy but posture - visibility, insistence, refusal to soften the message. And “poor folks and black folks” binds class and race in a way that exposes a persistent American trick: politicians will often tolerate anti-poverty rhetoric until it is racialized, and will sometimes tolerate civil-rights rhetoric until it is linked to redistribution. Evers treats that linkage as the real tripwire.
Contextually, Evers speaks from the long afterlife of the civil rights movement, when Democratic alignment with civil rights helped trigger white backlash, partisan realignment, and a durable campaign language of “law and order,” “welfare,” and “states’ rights” - coded ways to reject the very constituencies Evers names without saying so outright. His intent reads less like surrender than warning: if you want to win, you must understand the price exacted for saying, plainly, who government is for.
The phrasing matters. “Comes out as strong” suggests not just policy but posture - visibility, insistence, refusal to soften the message. And “poor folks and black folks” binds class and race in a way that exposes a persistent American trick: politicians will often tolerate anti-poverty rhetoric until it is racialized, and will sometimes tolerate civil-rights rhetoric until it is linked to redistribution. Evers treats that linkage as the real tripwire.
Contextually, Evers speaks from the long afterlife of the civil rights movement, when Democratic alignment with civil rights helped trigger white backlash, partisan realignment, and a durable campaign language of “law and order,” “welfare,” and “states’ rights” - coded ways to reject the very constituencies Evers names without saying so outright. His intent reads less like surrender than warning: if you want to win, you must understand the price exacted for saying, plainly, who government is for.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List


