"Anyone who makes plans for after the revolution is a reactionary"
About this Quote
Bakunin’s line is revolutionary purity sharpened into a threat: don’t just oppose the old order, refuse the very habit of ordering. It’s a slogan designed to police the movement from within, casting suspicion on the most basic act of political maturity - planning. In Bakunin’s world, “after” is where revolutions go to die, because the moment you draft blueprints, you’ve already smuggled hierarchy back in through the side door.
The word “reactionary” does the heavy lifting. It doesn’t mean “cautious” here; it’s an accusation of betrayal. Bakunin collapses a spectrum of disagreements into a moral binary: spontaneity equals liberation, foresight equals counterrevolution. That’s not sloppy rhetoric. It’s strategic. Anarchism, especially in Bakunin’s 19th-century fight with Marx and the rising socialist parties, feared that a transition state, a centralized plan, or a vanguard would calcify into a new tyranny. Planning becomes the seed of a new ruling class.
The subtext is an argument about power disguised as an argument about time. To plan for “after” is to claim the authority to define what “after” should look like, and who gets to enforce it. Bakunin’s jab anticipates the revolution’s most awkward question: how do you coordinate without reproducing command? His answer is to keep the revolution permanently unfinished, a continuous refusal rather than a program. It’s exhilarating, and also unnerving - because it treats governance itself as contamination, leaving “freedom” rhetorically pure but operationally unresolved.
The word “reactionary” does the heavy lifting. It doesn’t mean “cautious” here; it’s an accusation of betrayal. Bakunin collapses a spectrum of disagreements into a moral binary: spontaneity equals liberation, foresight equals counterrevolution. That’s not sloppy rhetoric. It’s strategic. Anarchism, especially in Bakunin’s 19th-century fight with Marx and the rising socialist parties, feared that a transition state, a centralized plan, or a vanguard would calcify into a new tyranny. Planning becomes the seed of a new ruling class.
The subtext is an argument about power disguised as an argument about time. To plan for “after” is to claim the authority to define what “after” should look like, and who gets to enforce it. Bakunin’s jab anticipates the revolution’s most awkward question: how do you coordinate without reproducing command? His answer is to keep the revolution permanently unfinished, a continuous refusal rather than a program. It’s exhilarating, and also unnerving - because it treats governance itself as contamination, leaving “freedom” rhetorically pure but operationally unresolved.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Mikhail
Add to List



