"Architects are pretty much high-class whores. We can turn down projects the way they can turn down some clients, but we've both got to say yes to someone if we want to stay in business"
About this Quote
Philip Johnson doesn’t lob this line as a confession so much as a provocation: an elite architect admitting, with a kind of patrician shrug, that “taste” is still a service industry. The profanity does the real work. By yoking architecture to sex work, he punctures the profession’s favorite self-myth - that architects are sovereign auteurs shaping cities from pure vision. Johnson’s jab insists on a less flattering reality: architecture is financed desire, and desire has patrons.
The intent is double-edged. On one level, it’s a cynical warning to younger designers who think talent alone buys freedom. On another, it’s a self-exoneration. If the market is the market, then compromise isn’t personal weakness; it’s structural. That logic is convenient for a figure like Johnson, who cultivated proximity to wealth and power and made a career out of being the most refined translator of a client’s ambition into glass, stone, and prestige.
The subtext is about consent and dependency. “We can turn down projects” acknowledges agency, but only up to the point where rent, salaries, reputation, and pipeline kick in. The final clause - “we’ve both got to say yes to someone” - reframes “integrity” as a luxury good. Johnson’s brilliance here is his bluntness: the architect’s product isn’t just a building, it’s legitimacy. Clients buy form, yes, but also cultural absolution. The line lands because it tells an uncomfortable truth about creative labor under capitalism: even the highest-class creativity still has a price list, and someone else usually signs the check.
The intent is double-edged. On one level, it’s a cynical warning to younger designers who think talent alone buys freedom. On another, it’s a self-exoneration. If the market is the market, then compromise isn’t personal weakness; it’s structural. That logic is convenient for a figure like Johnson, who cultivated proximity to wealth and power and made a career out of being the most refined translator of a client’s ambition into glass, stone, and prestige.
The subtext is about consent and dependency. “We can turn down projects” acknowledges agency, but only up to the point where rent, salaries, reputation, and pipeline kick in. The final clause - “we’ve both got to say yes to someone” - reframes “integrity” as a luxury good. Johnson’s brilliance here is his bluntness: the architect’s product isn’t just a building, it’s legitimacy. Clients buy form, yes, but also cultural absolution. The line lands because it tells an uncomfortable truth about creative labor under capitalism: even the highest-class creativity still has a price list, and someone else usually signs the check.
Quote Details
| Topic | Business |
|---|---|
| Source | Evidence: course the late prince albert but two swallows hardly make a summer do they mrs brown outside in the yard the dog commences to bark there now there is mr brown benjie hears him coming up the street td better nip back behind Other candidates (2) RIBA Journal (1993) primary95.9% ... Architects are pretty much high - class whores . We can turn down projects the way they can turn down some client... Philip Johnson (Philip Johnson) compilation31.6% 60s1990s architecture is the art of how to waste space the new york times 27 december 1964 p 9 the painters have ever... |
More Quotes by Philip
Add to List







