"Architecture arouses sentiments in man. The architect's task therefore, is to make those sentiments more precise"
About this Quote
Loos isn’t praising architecture for being “emotional.” He’s warning it. In a culture drunk on ornament at the turn of the 20th century, he treats feeling as a raw force that buildings inevitably trigger - pride, reverence, intimidation, calm - and then insists the architect has a moral duty to discipline it. The key word is “precise”: not bigger, not warmer, not more expressive. Precise, like a well-cut suit, where the point is restraint that reads as authority.
This line sits neatly beside his famous crusade against decoration. For Loos, ornament doesn’t enrich sentiment; it muddles it, turning a building into a loud argument about taste rather than a clear statement about use, status, and modern life. He’s making a modernist claim before modernism hardens into a style: that clarity is not aesthetic minimalism for its own sake, but a social ethic. If architecture shapes how we feel, then vagueness becomes manipulation, and excess becomes noise.
The subtext is power. “Sentiments in man” sounds universal, but Loos is thinking about how institutions and homes train behavior. A courtroom that feels weightless, a bank that feels playful, a home that feels like a showroom - these are failures of precision, not just of design. He’s arguing that good architecture edits emotion the way good writing edits thought: it doesn’t eliminate feeling, it makes it legible. In that sense, the architect becomes less a decorator of surfaces than an author of civic psychology.
This line sits neatly beside his famous crusade against decoration. For Loos, ornament doesn’t enrich sentiment; it muddles it, turning a building into a loud argument about taste rather than a clear statement about use, status, and modern life. He’s making a modernist claim before modernism hardens into a style: that clarity is not aesthetic minimalism for its own sake, but a social ethic. If architecture shapes how we feel, then vagueness becomes manipulation, and excess becomes noise.
The subtext is power. “Sentiments in man” sounds universal, but Loos is thinking about how institutions and homes train behavior. A courtroom that feels weightless, a bank that feels playful, a home that feels like a showroom - these are failures of precision, not just of design. He’s arguing that good architecture edits emotion the way good writing edits thought: it doesn’t eliminate feeling, it makes it legible. In that sense, the architect becomes less a decorator of surfaces than an author of civic psychology.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Adolf
Add to List






