"Are we controlled by our thoughts, or are we controlling our thoughts?"
About this Quote
Holliwell’s question lands like a polite trap: it forces you to notice how quickly you outsource your life to whatever’s happening in your head. The phrasing is deceptively even-handed, but the symmetry is doing rhetorical work. “Controlled” implies captivity, a mind hijacked by reflex, worry, appetite, or inherited scripts. “Controlling” implies agency, discipline, the possibility that attention can be trained. Put them side by side and you feel the pivot point where self-help becomes moral philosophy: if your thoughts run the show, who exactly is responsible for the outcomes?
The subtext is a gentle rebuke to modern passivity. We like to treat thoughts as weather systems: they arrive, they pass, they’re not “us.” Holliwell nudges you toward a tougher view: thoughts can be habits, and habits can be chosen or at least reconditioned. That’s why the line works as an internal diagnostic rather than a slogan. It invites you to catch yourself mid-rumination, mid-spiral, and ask whether you’re witnessing a mind or piloting one.
Context matters. Holliwell wrote in the mid-century American self-improvement tradition, where “success” literature doubled as a civic religion: character was destiny, and mindset was character’s front door. Read today, it sits neatly beside cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness, but it’s more bluntly ethical: if you can influence your thoughts, you can’t fully hide behind them. The question doesn’t offer comfort; it offers leverage.
The subtext is a gentle rebuke to modern passivity. We like to treat thoughts as weather systems: they arrive, they pass, they’re not “us.” Holliwell nudges you toward a tougher view: thoughts can be habits, and habits can be chosen or at least reconditioned. That’s why the line works as an internal diagnostic rather than a slogan. It invites you to catch yourself mid-rumination, mid-spiral, and ask whether you’re witnessing a mind or piloting one.
Context matters. Holliwell wrote in the mid-century American self-improvement tradition, where “success” literature doubled as a civic religion: character was destiny, and mindset was character’s front door. Read today, it sits neatly beside cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness, but it’s more bluntly ethical: if you can influence your thoughts, you can’t fully hide behind them. The question doesn’t offer comfort; it offers leverage.
Quote Details
| Topic | Free Will & Fate |
|---|
More Quotes by Raymond
Add to List









