"Aren't women prudes if they don't and prostitutes if they do?"
About this Quote
The subtext is less about sex than about power: female desire is treated as illegible unless it’s either nonexistent (and therefore “respectable”) or commodified (and therefore “available” and punishable). The binary also reveals how “sexual liberation” can be booby-trapped; permissiveness isn’t automatically freedom if the culture keeps its old punishments and just changes the timing. Women are invited to be modern, but only on terms that preserve male comfort: not too much agency, not too much refusal.
Context matters. Millett wrote and organized in the heat of second-wave feminism, when arguments over the sexual revolution, marriage, pornography, and “respectability” politics were fierce. The line anticipates debates that still loop today: slut-shaming rebranded as “standards,” purity culture repackaged as “wellness,” and “sex-positive” rhetoric that can slide into new expectations. Millett’s question doesn’t ask for an answer; it exposes the rigged scoring system.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Millett, Kate. (2026, January 15). Aren't women prudes if they don't and prostitutes if they do? FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/arent-women-prudes-if-they-dont-and-prostitutes-126383/
Chicago Style
Millett, Kate. "Aren't women prudes if they don't and prostitutes if they do?" FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/arent-women-prudes-if-they-dont-and-prostitutes-126383/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Aren't women prudes if they don't and prostitutes if they do?" FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/arent-women-prudes-if-they-dont-and-prostitutes-126383/. Accessed 9 Feb. 2026.








