"Arguments only confirm people in their own opinions"
About this Quote
A polite slap at the Progressive Era faith that reasoned debate can sand down human stubbornness. Tarkington’s line doesn’t just distrust “arguments”; it suspects the whole bourgeois ritual of persuasion. The verb choice matters: arguments don’t change minds, they “confirm.” That’s courtroom language, not classroom language. The point isn’t that people fail to understand; it’s that they use understanding as a weapon to reinforce what they already want to believe.
Coming from a novelist who anatomized Midwestern respectability and its self-justifying moral codes, the subtext is social, not merely psychological. Tarkington’s characters often inhabit a world where status, habit, and reputation do the heavy lifting. In that setting, argument functions as performance: a way to signal intelligence, virtue, or belonging to the right camp. You don’t argue to discover the truth; you argue to demonstrate you already possess it. The more heat you bring, the more you invite the other person to retreat into identity and pride.
There’s a quiet cynicism here, but also a writer’s craft insight. Good fiction rarely “wins” by debate; it seduces readers into recognition. Tarkington is effectively advocating for narrative over disputation, empathy over syllogism. It’s a warning to reformers and scolds: if your goal is change, the frontal assault of logic may be the least efficient tool. People don’t surrender opinions because they were out-debated; they shift when the story of who they are can change without humiliation.
Coming from a novelist who anatomized Midwestern respectability and its self-justifying moral codes, the subtext is social, not merely psychological. Tarkington’s characters often inhabit a world where status, habit, and reputation do the heavy lifting. In that setting, argument functions as performance: a way to signal intelligence, virtue, or belonging to the right camp. You don’t argue to discover the truth; you argue to demonstrate you already possess it. The more heat you bring, the more you invite the other person to retreat into identity and pride.
There’s a quiet cynicism here, but also a writer’s craft insight. Good fiction rarely “wins” by debate; it seduces readers into recognition. Tarkington is effectively advocating for narrative over disputation, empathy over syllogism. It’s a warning to reformers and scolds: if your goal is change, the frontal assault of logic may be the least efficient tool. People don’t surrender opinions because they were out-debated; they shift when the story of who they are can change without humiliation.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Booth
Add to List







