"Around '75 when the recession hit, club owners started going to disco because it was cheaper for them to just buy a sound system than it was to hire a band"
About this Quote
There’s a whole economic history of American nightlife packed into Tommy Shaw’s offhand grievance. He’s not romanticizing “real music” so much as tracing a cold pivot point: when the mid-70s recession tightened margins, the club scene stopped being a cultural ecosystem and started behaving like any other business under stress. Bands weren’t just artists; they were payroll, risk, rehearsal time, personalities. A sound system was a one-time capital expense that didn’t demand a cut of the bar, didn’t get sick, didn’t argue about set times.
Shaw’s intent is partly explanatory, partly accusatory. He’s pushing back on the tidy myth that disco “won” purely because tastes evolved. The subtext is labor: live musicians got undercut by technology and a new format that made music scalable. Disco didn’t need four temperamental guys and a van; it needed records, a DJ, and a room built for turnover. That’s not a moral failure, he implies, but it is a structural one - a shift in who gets paid, who gets seen, and what kind of performance a city can afford.
Culturally, the line also gestures at how quickly authenticity talk follows economics. When budgets change, people retroactively dress it up as a battle of genres, generations, even identities. Shaw’s perspective comes from inside rock’s working class: the gigging circuit as livelihood. He’s naming the moment nightlife learned a hard lesson that’s still with us in the streaming era: convenience and cost don’t just reshape music distribution; they reshape what music is.
Shaw’s intent is partly explanatory, partly accusatory. He’s pushing back on the tidy myth that disco “won” purely because tastes evolved. The subtext is labor: live musicians got undercut by technology and a new format that made music scalable. Disco didn’t need four temperamental guys and a van; it needed records, a DJ, and a room built for turnover. That’s not a moral failure, he implies, but it is a structural one - a shift in who gets paid, who gets seen, and what kind of performance a city can afford.
Culturally, the line also gestures at how quickly authenticity talk follows economics. When budgets change, people retroactively dress it up as a battle of genres, generations, even identities. Shaw’s perspective comes from inside rock’s working class: the gigging circuit as livelihood. He’s naming the moment nightlife learned a hard lesson that’s still with us in the streaming era: convenience and cost don’t just reshape music distribution; they reshape what music is.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Tommy
Add to List


