"As a civilian during the Second War, I was exposed to danger in circumstances which removed any distinction between the man in and the man out of uniform"
About this Quote
Pearson’s line quietly punctures the comforting wartime myth that danger is a soldier’s exclusive property. He’s not romanticizing the front; he’s leveling the moral ledger. “As a civilian” is the key credential here, a disclaimer that disarms the usual hierarchy of sacrifice. Then comes the sharp pivot: he “was exposed to danger” in circumstances that made uniform and non-uniform irrelevant. The sentence is built like a legal argument, but it lands like a democratic provocation.
The intent is political as much as personal. Pearson is framing World War II as total war, where bombs, rationing, intelligence work, and civilian targets collapsed the old categories of combatant and bystander. In that world, the uniform becomes less a marker of vulnerability than a symbol of institutional recognition. He’s implicitly asking: who gets honored, who gets listened to, whose risk counts? The subtext is also a warning against easy militarism. If civilians can be endangered without the agency, training, or protections granted to soldiers, then the moral cost of war expands, and the state’s responsibility grows heavier.
Context matters: Pearson is a mid-century architect of liberal internationalism, a believer in alliances and rules designed to prevent exactly this kind of blurred, civilian-scorching conflict. The quote works because it’s modest in tone while radical in implication: it doesn’t steal valor; it challenges the audience to see war’s danger as shared, and therefore war’s justification as harder.
The intent is political as much as personal. Pearson is framing World War II as total war, where bombs, rationing, intelligence work, and civilian targets collapsed the old categories of combatant and bystander. In that world, the uniform becomes less a marker of vulnerability than a symbol of institutional recognition. He’s implicitly asking: who gets honored, who gets listened to, whose risk counts? The subtext is also a warning against easy militarism. If civilians can be endangered without the agency, training, or protections granted to soldiers, then the moral cost of war expands, and the state’s responsibility grows heavier.
Context matters: Pearson is a mid-century architect of liberal internationalism, a believer in alliances and rules designed to prevent exactly this kind of blurred, civilian-scorching conflict. The quote works because it’s modest in tone while radical in implication: it doesn’t steal valor; it challenges the audience to see war’s danger as shared, and therefore war’s justification as harder.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Lester
Add to List
