"As Brian Urquhart has said quite correctly, I don't think that individual countries in the international community can stand aside and let all of these slaughters continue without doing anything"
About this Quote
The line has the clipped urgency of a soldier trying to smuggle moral outrage into the cool grammar of diplomacy. Morrison doesn’t thunder; he hedges - “I don’t think” - then drives the point like a bayonet: “stand aside,” “let,” “continue,” “without doing anything.” The syntax is a staircase of complicity. Every verb assigns agency not to the killers but to the bystanders, implying that passivity isn’t neutrality; it’s a choice with casualties attached.
Invoking Brian Urquhart matters. Urquhart is shorthand for the postwar internationalist conscience: the UN-era belief that sovereignty can’t be a polite excuse for watching civilians get butchered. Morrison borrows that authority to shift the argument from sentiment to obligation. It’s not “we should help” as charity; it’s “we can’t keep pretending we’re uninvolved” as ethics. The phrase “international community” also does double duty: it sounds high-minded, but it’s a pressure tactic, a way of saying, if we claim membership in this club, we inherit its responsibilities.
The subtext is a quiet indictment of selective intervention. “All of these slaughters” suggests repetition - not a single crisis but a pattern of recurring horror met with recurring handwringing. Coming from a soldier, the statement carries an implicit willingness to accept the unpleasant corollary: “doing anything” may mean force, not just statements, sanctions, or aid.
Contextually, it sits in the long argument of the 20th century: after mass violence made isolationism look like a luxury, the hardest question became not whether outsiders may intervene, but how long they can afford to pretend they shouldn’t.
Invoking Brian Urquhart matters. Urquhart is shorthand for the postwar internationalist conscience: the UN-era belief that sovereignty can’t be a polite excuse for watching civilians get butchered. Morrison borrows that authority to shift the argument from sentiment to obligation. It’s not “we should help” as charity; it’s “we can’t keep pretending we’re uninvolved” as ethics. The phrase “international community” also does double duty: it sounds high-minded, but it’s a pressure tactic, a way of saying, if we claim membership in this club, we inherit its responsibilities.
The subtext is a quiet indictment of selective intervention. “All of these slaughters” suggests repetition - not a single crisis but a pattern of recurring horror met with recurring handwringing. Coming from a soldier, the statement carries an implicit willingness to accept the unpleasant corollary: “doing anything” may mean force, not just statements, sanctions, or aid.
Contextually, it sits in the long argument of the 20th century: after mass violence made isolationism look like a luxury, the hardest question became not whether outsiders may intervene, but how long they can afford to pretend they shouldn’t.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Alex
Add to List






